El miércoles, 23 de agosto de 2006 a las 21:24:16 +1000, Anthony Towns escribía:
We choose to apply the DFSG both to the components that the Debian system
requires, and to what we use to provide debian.org services. It can be
No, the DFSG are applied to what's provided by Debian, not to what
El miércoles, 23 de agosto de 2006 a las 14:59:37 +0100, Matthew Garrett
escribía:
No, the DFSG are applied to what's provided by Debian, not to what it's
required by it.
The DFSG apply to The Debian system. The social contract doesn't
define what The Debian system is. We could define it
El jueves, 6 de abril de 2006 a las 09:04:35 +0200, Josselin Mouette escribía:
At the end of DFSG #2, the following text should be added:
The license may restrict distribution to some kinds of media if
it is still possible to distribute the source code and compiled
El jueves, 6 de abril de 2006 a las 19:06:50 +0200, Sam Hocevar escribía:
Indeed. Would such a wording be acceptable:
As a special exception, the license may forbid use of
technical measures to restrict access or use of the software
itself, as long as the license author
El jueves, 6 de abril de 2006 a las 22:15:49 +0200, Josselin Mouette escribía:
Well, no. If the author makes that promise, we may just as well wait until
that happens and the package is free. It's not like we've run out of
software to package :-)
Now, please re-read Manoj's email and
El jueves, 6 de abril de 2006 a las 23:12:20 +0200, Sam Hocevar escribía:
Well, no. If the author makes that promise, we may just as well wait until
that happens and the package is free. It's not like we've run out of
software to package :-)
Oh. I really must have been on another
El martes, 24 de enero de 2006 a las 14:32:39 +0200, Anton Zinoviev escribía:
You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the
reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute
The permissions are clearly a technical measure.
They clearly obstruct and
7 matches
Mail list logo
