-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Loïc Minier wrote:
If the intent is to include it in our CD-ROMs, I think some people will
want a really really free CD-ROM which doesn't have this section.
Or maybe an explicit debconf question about the non-free nature? This
could make sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Didier Raboud wrote:
And if this section is not considered part of the Debian system, why
including software from it on the Debian CD's ? (The inverse question is to
be answered too…)
Because it might be required in order to install all that free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
The idea is to create a new section that contains files like
firmware images and FPGA data that gets written to the hardware
to make it fully functional. It is not meant for drivers that run
on the host CPU.
[FWIW, I've been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I suspect it would not be hard to create a non-free installer CD
that obviates the requirement of a separate USB key for remote
installs.
If (almost?) everyone will use non-free stuff anyway, why not just make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Finney wrote:
The Debian system we provide is usable. There may be devices which are
not yet operable with Debian,
Which wireless card is supported by debian without any sourceless
firmware, either loaded by the kernel or present on the chip?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18 2008, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
The Debian system we provide is usable. There may be devices which are
not yet operable with Debian,
Which wireless card is supported by debian without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ean Schuessler wrote:
- Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not part of my GR as proposed and seconded.
If anybody wants to change the words of either the DFSG or the SC
they will need to propose an amendmend.
As proposed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
-- [Forward] -
From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:01:13 +0100
- code uploaded into another cpu (a device cpu, not a SMP cpu of some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
May I suggest so-called \blobs\ or some indication that blob is an
informal term?
Informal like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_blob ?
- From there it appears it is better described as 'binary blob' in order
not to confuse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ean Schuessler wrote:
Johannes Wiedersich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would propose to create a new section of the archive, called
'sourceless' or such. Stuff within this archive doesn't have full
sources. It is legally distributable and follows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Absolutely. I'm looking into creating such unofficial CDs already as
part of the regular builds.
I think I agree with the suggestion of creating a new archive section
for firmware - packages that are acknowledged to not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Can someone explain me why all these threads smell of gratuitous RM
bashing?
Simple statistics: there are many DDs, but only few RMs.
Simple sociology: those who are content, don't complain.
Those also don't go in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10 2008, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:27:59 +0100 Robert Millan wrote:
I think you're trying to imply that somehow SC #1
and SC #4 are not consistent. That is, that our priorities are our
13 matches
Mail list logo
