Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-26 Thread Kyle Robbertze
Let's try this signed. Seconded On 2021/11/26 12:35, Kyle Robbertze wrote: On 2021/11/23 09:53, Wouter Verhelst wrote: aaand this should've been signed. Good morning. On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: ... and then I realize I *also* made a (small

Re: GR: Change the resolution process (corrected)

2021-11-26 Thread Kyle Robbertze
Rename to A.4. A.3.6 (now A.4.6): replace 'A.3.4' by 'A.4.4'. A.4. Rename to A.5. A.4.2 (now A.5.2): replace '§A.5' by '§A.6'. A.5. Rename (back) to A.6. Seconded -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze

Re: Option G update [signed] (was Re: Proposal: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations)

2019-12-06 Thread Kyle Robbertze
is in our general interest to try to > work things out with others, to compromise, to reach solutions or find > alternatives that might be satisfactory enough for the various parties > involved, to create an environment where we will collectively try to > reciprocate. And in the end and in most cases it's perhaps a matter of > just being willing to try. > X< Seconded -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Last minute cominbations G+D and/or G+E

2019-12-05 Thread Kyle Robbertze
e references to bugs which are not relevant to the > topic at hand. > > Communications on Debian fora on these matters should all be encouraging and > pleasant, even when discussing technical problems. We ask that communication > fora owners strictly enforce this. > > 15. We respectfully ask all Debian contributors including maintainers, Policy > Editors, the Release Team, the Technical Committee, and the Project Leader, to > pursue these goals and principles in their work, and embed them into documents > etc. as appropriate. (This resolution is a position statement under s4.1(5).) > Seconded -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Last minute cominbations G+D and/or G+E

2019-12-05 Thread Kyle Robbertze
s should all be >encouraging and pleasant, even when discussing technical problems. >We ask that communication fora owners strictly enforce this. > > 12. We respectfully ask all Debian contributors including maintainers, >Policy Editors, the Release Team, the Technical Committee, and the >Project Leader, to pursue these goals and principles in their work, >and embed them into documents etc. as appropriate. >(This resolution is a position statement under s4.1(5).) > > Seconded -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Proposal: Init Diversity

2019-11-21 Thread Kyle Robbertze
ot > provide, and/or will not accept, an init script. > I second this proposal. Cheers -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer ⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [draft] Draft text on Init Systems GR

2019-11-19 Thread Kyle Robbertze
Hi, On 2019/11/19 02:37, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon 18 Nov 2019 at 04:57PM +00, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: [draft] Draft text on Init Systems GR"): >>> Ian Jackson writes: + (with no substantial effect on systemd installations) >>> >>> Yes, that looks

Re: Proposal: Init Diversity

2019-11-17 Thread Kyle Robbertze
Hi, On 2019/11/17 18:05, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > Here I formally propose following option, withdrawing any previous > versions. > > Being able to run Debian systems with init systems other than > systemd continues to be value for the project. Package MUST work > with pid1 !=

Re: Re-Proposing: General Resolution on Init Systems and systemd

2019-11-17 Thread Kyle Robbertze
t;Communications on Debian fora on these matters should all be >encouraging and pleasant, even when discussing technical problems. >We ask that communication fora owners strictly enforce this. > > 12. We respectfully ask all Debian contributors including maintainers