PLD.
>
> The Debian project asks the EU to not draw a line between commercial
> and non-commercial use of FOSS. Such line should instead be between
> closed-source software and FOSS. FOSS should be entirely exempt from
> the CRA and the PLD.
>
> END O
to be truly editorial, but of course
>please speak up if you object.
>
I agree.
Kind regards
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail
ware from the Debian archive available
for download alongside with the free media in a way that the user is informed
before downloading which media are the free ones.
=
Seconded.
Thanks for making the update.
Kind regards,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.de
nently, so that
newcomers will find them more easily; fully-free images will not be
hidden away; they will be linked from the same project pages, but with
less visual priority.
=
Seconded.
Thanks everybody working in solving this issue.
Kind regards,
--
Laura Ar
,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ibutors.debian.org/-/issues/29
I have no idea about how to fix that, I guess contacting the Data Source
maintainers:
https://contributors.debian.org/source/vote.debian.org/members/
or adding oneself as maintainer and try to fix the data submissions.
Kind regards,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https
tio N, if V(A,D)
>>> is greater or equal to N * V(D,A) and V(A,D) is strictly great
>>
>> The "... and V(A,D) is strictly great" looks like an incomplete
>> sentence. Is that something we can fix as an editorial correction (i.e.
>> without a vote)?
>
> See #896067.
>
>
> Kurt
>
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Hi
El 30/3/19 a las 23:22, Joerg Jaspert escribió:
> On 15356 March 1977, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>
>> There are some teams in Debian that focus in areas similar to the DPL
>> tasks and allow people to make a difference in the project working on
>> them, without t
e DPL role is what is wrong and we should reconsider (and
promote the other structures that we have (teams,
delegates-or-call-them-what-you-like,etc) that allow more different
levels of commitment).
Kind regards,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
:-)
What are your views on this?
Kind regards,
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
odon_(software)
> Follow me on Mastodon! :) https://mastodon.xyz/@highvoltage
>
Debian is already in Mastodon (which federates with GNU Social):
https://fosstodon.org/@debian
(it's a non-official account replicating what is posted in
https://micronews.debian.org ).
Kind regard
IPA" than "ITP" would be really beneficial to the project.
What do IPA and ITP mean in this context?
Thanks
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
ing a Debian BoF
> where there was universal agreement that diversity was a good thing but
> when prompted with a question of "OK, so what shall we do?" there was
> little advice beyond being welcoming, etc. being exchanged.
>
> Without addressing this, we could end up simply paying lip service to the
> concept to the detriment of all.
>
>
> Regards,
>
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
asis, or whole areas to new or existing teams ? Do you
envisage sending out public calls for volunteers ?
Would you look favourably on unsolicited requests from a contributor,
to have limited powers delegated to them to deal with a matter that
contributor wants to try to see fixed ?
Ian.
--
Laur
14 matches
Mail list logo
