ing all this noise to the list.
--
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nks Russ, I agree 100% with you.
--
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
work” mentality.
--
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
, and if so, in which way you think you could help solve it.
Tincho.
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2017/03/msg00038.html
--
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:49 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> to ini
ace them is perfectly fine in
> > your POV. I must be watching the wrong channel.
> Straw man. Amusing how you take my proposal (to find inactive
> members, or less active members, and bring their heads to the block
> first), adopt my ideas as your own, and then turn around and castigate
> me for being opposed to my own idea.
Do you realise that I was talking about "many core teams" (sic) and
not about the ctte (and that was what you dismissed)?
--
Martín Ferrari
t think many people would
> > argue that many core teams would benefit greatly with those two rules.
>
> I have seen very little data supporting that assertion.
I guess that giving control of most important part of a project of
hundreds (or thousands) to a very few set of peopl
the idea of people
leaving the ctte after some term... ideas that to me look entirely
reasonable, and common practice.
I don't know about the tech ctte. but I don't think many people would
argue that many core teams would benefit greatly with those two rules.
--
Martín Ferrari
8 matches
Mail list logo
