On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 07:37:45PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:05:51 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> For what it is worth, devotee did get an email grom tb, and his
> >> name appears on the
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:48:51PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Monday 11 April 2005 04:41 pm, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > For those who are tired of pressing page up/page down to understand the
> > listing... a s/Option \d/$candidates[$1]/ge is helpfull...
>
> Or you could look at Manoj's cool
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 02:57:43AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 24 March 2005 16:52, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> Happily, the OP still has a chance to change his mind ;-)
> >
> > Unless someone else sends in his already signed ballot...
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:26:44PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:07:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:57:23AM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > > This is obviously unacceptable. Why would a small number of people be
> > > allowed to veto
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:36:49AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> If it's fair to call one-sided example genders on www.debian as
> a bug, let's call it a bug where it happens across all debian.
That's a fair call. So are you going to follow d-women's example, get
involved in the project you feel is a pr
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:44:31AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:11:16PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:41:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:26:04PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:41:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:26:04PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > For anyone still watching, I prepared a concise summary of Sven's behaviour
> > in d-legal here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg0
[Don't Cc me; I read the list]
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:27:48AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:26:04PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:35:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:46:39PM +, MJ
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:35:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:46:39PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > He, i can inform you that in our "small team" as Andreas would say, for
> > > which
> > > i came to post 300+ mails to -legal in o
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:52:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Still, debian-legal should inform the maintainers and invite them to take
> part of the discussion when examining packages which have been in main for
> years.
Since inviting you in drowned d-legal in waffle and insult for a good coupl
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 05:55:48PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.06.0242 +0100]:
> > But debian-women contributors include both men and women.
>
> Why is it called debian-women?
One of the benefits of starting a project is that you ge
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:29:09PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >
> > > DFSG-revisionists are the people who in the last year invented things
> > > like the "dissident test"
> >
> > searc
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:22:09AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:19:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since we still have a previous stable release, the six
> month release cycle means our current stable release will be released as
> the new release if necessary. In
[Just when you think all hope in a thread is lost, along comes a post with
Clue]
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 03:10:37AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:09:26AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Arguing in favou
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:09:26AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have, IMO. I consider discrimination on the basis of sex to be sexism.
> > i.e., you favour the law of the jungle. Which, may I say, has a fine
> > history of maintaining artificial imbalances c
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:55:49AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > A page about people that only admits contributions from women.
> > What's the URL, please?
>
> http://women.alioth.debian.org/profiles/
I have a pa
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 02:19:48AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Once again, your complaint is about a topic restriction, not a
> > restriction on who is allowed to address that topic.
>
> Cool, so declaring all discussions and collaboration involving
>
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:48:21AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:59:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I have some real trouble with the fact that all the work i do for debian
> > > is
> > > reported to the US secr
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:25:49AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can list all the mailing lists and fora you read, but the point is that
> > unless you watch the entire world's open communications, you will miss
> > ann
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:09:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:07:06AM -0800, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > >Anthony Towns writes:
> > >>resolves the complaints about NEW and hence I don't think that the NEW
> > >>issue is an example of a communicatio
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:07:36PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I didn't find "the new mentoring programme" either. I remember being
> > > told some time ago that a mentor course would be announced,
> > >
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:05PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > It will be interesting to see how krooger and helen_ml_faulkner
> > interact in the debate!
>
> Entirely professionally, I expect. At least from Helen's side. She
> (like Manoj as project secrerary and others in similar positions
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 05:28:47PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:20:40PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > > > The longest journey begins with a single step. Not even the shortest
> > > > > journey begins without that single step!
> > > > G
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:20:40PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But you saw no need to consult the people you named prior to including them
> > in a list of "appointees" as to whether they would be willing to be a part
&g
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 05:14:53PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Immediate examples that come to mind include their detailed articles on
> > the NM process, the new mentoring programme that they are developing and
> > a growing collection of entry-level articles o
[presumably you wanted this to the list and just misreplied]
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:47:19PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 05:28:05PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:03:59PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> >>Th
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:43:14PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 05:28:05PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >>The longest journey begins with a single step. Not even the shortest
> >>journey begins without that single step!
> >
> >Givin
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:03:59PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 10:10:45PM -0500, Erinn Clark wrote:
> >None of the individuals listed in the gender imbalance section were
> >consulted about this plan
>
> The initial slate of stakeholder candidates were chosen for their
, I think
this clause should be removed.
--
-------
#include
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
29 matches
Mail list logo
