-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Steve McIntyre wrote: >That's an awkward question to answer, and I've been involved in >debates on it several times already over the last couple of years. We >need to work this out as a project; this may take quite some time >yet... I've seen this come up at Debconf 4, during the DPL debates last year, and probably has happened a number of other times. You've apparantly been involved in discussions on this several times over the years. It appears as if this issue isn't going to solve itself as years have passed with no progress. My guess is that it requires leadership to make it happen. Do you think you would provide that leadership Do any of the candidates think that they would, or is this an issue that will have to wait for someone else to take it on? If it should be someone other than the DPL, why? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEHbRx9n4qXRzy1ioRAsQwAKCHe9h8tDgjNo0Qi3DUP4pnidU2UgCeJ2Uu 2kaMhkeg7WwwxYv0fdQJBtM= =dDHf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]