Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware

> We will include non-free firmware packages from the > "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official > media (installer images and live images). The included firmware > binaries will *normally* be enabled by default where the system > determines that they are required, but wher

Re: Proposal: Focus on systemd

Sean Whitton schrieb: > I would be grateful for an informal summary of why proposal F is thought > to be needed on the ballot in addition to proposal C. What is thought > not captured well by Sam's text, but is thought to be captured well by > Martin's text? >From my PoV: - Less ambigious, C onl

Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

Scott Kitterman wrote: > Has anyone ever > seriously questioned the appropriateness of the Security Team's practices > based on the Social Contract? Not in the last 11 years since I'm around. If that came up before, Martin or Wichert should know. > I don't think we should be monkeying with the

Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement.

> Here is the text: > > --- > > The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General > Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome = > of > the vote. > > Regarding the sub