Martin wrote:
> I'd like submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and cross-distributio=
> n cooperation
I second this proposal.
Cheers,
Moritz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> What this position requires is the minimal level of morality to not use
> it to favor an opinion or another. And this is something Manoj has been
> repeatedly doing; first in the GFDL GR, next in the etch firmwares GR,
> now in the lenny one.
>
> I do not trust anymore the
On 2008-11-16, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Le dimanche 16 novembre 2008 à 11:34 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>
>>> So, really, we cannot release programs (firmware) in main
>>> without source code just because a few delegat
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>
> I'm hereby proposing the following general resolution:
>
>| Firmware is data such as microcode or lookup tables that is loaded into
>| hardware components in order to make the component function properly.
>| It is not code that is run on
Julien BLACHE wrote:
>> I belive that Robert's resolution is a waste of time in that it adds
>
> Doubly so.
AOL.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > FWIW, it's orphaned since yesterday. But let's keep it in Lenny
>> > > as well, I no longer care.
>> > Can you please elaborate? "Orphaned, pretty bad security record, let's
>> > keep it" -> I don't understand.
Of course it's meant ironic (for the fi
Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Well, just to pick an example, if the TC had chosen you to deal with
>> the wordpress-in-stable issue, and you had personally decided it
>> needed to be in stable, and had done whatever work was initially
>> needed to get it into stable with security support, you'd still be
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
> infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
> As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
> july.
> (http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-graphs/index.
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
> elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
>
> Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
> that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you he
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> While we're at it, I've long felt that a one-year DPL term is just too
> short (because a DPL needs to spend a few months to get worked in, and
> can't do all that much when the next election is about to turn up for
> fear of being accused to be campaigning, often leaving o
Hi,
I second the GR proposal quoted below.
Cheers,
Moritz
>=3D=3D=3D=3D Debian Maintainers Proposal =3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> The Debian Project endorses the concept of "Debian Maintainers" with
> limited access, and resolves that:
>
> 1) A new keyring will be created, called the "Debian maintaine
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, ajt wrote:
Thanks Aj, that's the best GR proposed so far.
I second the proposal below.
Cheers,
Moritz
>
> The Debian Project resolves that:
>
> (a) The Social Contract shall be reverted to its original form,
> as at http://www.debian.or
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> 4. Determines that as a special exception to DFSG #2, source code for
>> device firmware will not be required until we have the technical means
>> to split them out in a convenient way for our users.
>
> I'd rather suggest to give a direct hint in time. Like "until e
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, you wrote:
> It's my hope that this strikes a reasonable balance between respecting the
> views of individual developers and advancing a viable policy for the project
> so that we can move forward together on the goal of making each Debian
> release a first-class,
Anthony Towns wrote:
> There are, for instance, a range of outstanding RC bugs
> on sudo as a result of the security release for it that need fixing,
> which aiui aren't being worked on
Bdale said he would prepare a patch, that would add more documentation
and whitelist some more env vars like DIS
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Debian and the GNU Free Documentation License
> =
>
> This is the position of the Debian Project about the GNU Free Documentation
> License as published by the Free Software Foundation:
>
> 1. We consider that the GNU Free Docum
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, you wrote:
> As far as I am aware, neither the proposal nor the amendment
> have been modified/re-ratified; and no other GR or amendment has met
> the required number of seconds; so the page at
I just seconded it; Anton's amendment now has the required
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Hereby I am proposing an amendment to the GR about GFDL opened by
> Anthony Towns [Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:02:04 +1000]
>
> I wish to thank everybody who will support this amendment, especially
> I wish to thank those who second it.
I second the amendment quoted below. It's my
In linux.debian.vote Adeodato wrote:
> I propose an amendment to this GR, consisting in replacing the
> existing text with the one below. I initially tried to follow
> Anthony's original text as close as possible, and just add a paragraph
> and reword a couple sentences, but I didn't quite
19 matches
Mail list logo
