Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2015: Call for votes [corrected]

you reach your last choice. Do not enter a number smaller than 1 or larger than 3. I'm maybe be a little late for this, but at the end of this paragraph, you meant ``... or larger than 4'' right ? [...] -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: DM vote (was Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2010 Results)

, but it worth considering. [...] -- Rémi Vanicat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4s6i91q@debian.org

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2010: Call for votes

4: Margarita Manterola [ 4 ] Choice 5: None Of The Above - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- Rémi Vanicat pgpZyQC8771tP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Option 1 (reaffirm the Social Contract) ~~~ 1. We affirm that our Priorities are our users and the free software community (Social Contract #4); 2. We

Re: Discussion period: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, The message in [EMAIL PROTECTED] has received enough seconds to start the discussion period. The text of the resolution is: -- -

Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny

are legally allowed to do so, and the firmware is distributed upstream under a license that complies with the DFSG. (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1 majority) I hereby second both the first and second proposition - -- Rémi Vanicat -BEGIN PGP