) I don't see a conflict of interest and (2)
> even if there were one, these can be disclosed and dealt with. Hosting
> isn't that opaque.
>
+1
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 12:14:01AM +0530, Sruthi Chandran wrote:
>On 28/03/24 05:56, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> Greetings candidates,
>
> QUESTION TO THE CANDIDATES: what are your quantitative diversity goals
> and metrics, and what are the rationales behind those
desiring to
advance the project's efforts in the area of gender diversity?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
tentional) lack of
transparency.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 06:57:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Am Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 07:30:51AM -0400 schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
> > ...
> > In any event, rather than infer what you might believe, I thought it
> > more respectful and h
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:59:13PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Roberto" == Roberto C Sánchez writes:
> Roberto> I can infer that you likely view the current ratio of around 3%
> women
> Roberto> (33/1004) and around 96% men ((1
some insight into how you
shaped your view so that those who consider voting for you might
understand how you would like to reshape the Debian project.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Projects/Statistics
[1] https://www.debian.org/devel///developers.loc.en.html
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ion_(United_Nations)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio
[2]
https://web.archive.org/web/20220131080803/https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-determinants/gender/gender-definitions/whoeurope-brief-transgender-health-in-the-context-of-icd-11
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Anything we say can be used by a manipulative
> politician to make it seem that we support their cause.
>
In the same way that our silence can also be used.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:29:12PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 07:53:22AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Can we have a clear statement of what "directly affects people"?
>
> for those having lost people due to covid, hearing
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:43:53PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 16803 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > Yet, would someone posting about the earth being flat, the moon landings
> > being faked, or aliens being kept in various secret government
> > faciliti
the
project?
BTW, I think that in this particular instance it did "directly impact
the operation of Debian itself" because pandemic-related restrictions
(e.g., vaccines, travel distruptions, etc.) became something that
impacted Debian events and operations.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:22:48PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote on 11/11/2021 at 13:56:24+0100:
> > If we as a project allow some to make changes without considering the
> > concerns of those affected by the changes, we are not being faith
deas of those affected and think that
those should be considered alongside the proposals for change. That's
the way this project has determined that we should do things. If we as
a project allow some to make changes without considering the concerns of
those affected by the changes, we are no
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:13:15PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez [2021-04-18 16:10]:
> > However, that seems likely to only work if there is a method for
> > drafting the statement first and then simply having an up or down vote.
> No, because we have a r
ow for adding more
options) or an entirely different mechanism may need to be discussed.
It isn't clear how all of it would work in practice.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
g out the more sensible meaning that I missed.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:18:51PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>
> On 4/2/21 16:56, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:49:04PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> > > On 4/2/21 09:20, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > > TEXT OF OPTION 5
> > >
on Sep 7 14:13:23 EDT 1998: [PGP/IG] Updated the key of Dima Barsky
* Thu Sep 10 18:10:03 EDT 1998: [PGP/IG] Added the key of Craig Sanders
So, to summarize: when you became a Debian Developer, Craig had already
been a Debian Developer for about 18 years.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
s,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ty in those who participate in the discussions to an
excessive degree.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:15:08PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 avril 2021 à 08:40:26-0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 01 avril 2021 à 12:11:18+0100, Stev
decried for escalating (or even simply
calling for civility) because they are expressing a "disfavored" or
"wrong" opinion is a literal double-standard. We should be above that.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
re.
>
>
Quite a masterful work. I am quite impressed by the effort you put
forth.
Thanks very much for this. It provided a much appreciated hearty laugh
for me.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
ging. Plenty of
comments in the last few days seem to indicate that such might not be
the case. Why not form a new organization, like "The Foundation for
Free Software (FFS)"? Or some name that is better distinguished from
that of the FSF.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:38:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 06:28:36PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:20:33PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
r words.
Either private individuals and entities have freedom of association, or
they do not. You can't have it both ways.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 07:28:14PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Gard Spreemann (2021-03-25 19:21:36)
> >
> > Margarita Manterola writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:59 PM Roberto C. Sánchez
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
> our technical project, outside of this fight.
>
> Exactly -- big +1
>
I understand that it is not always possible to be completely apolitical,
even for Debian as an organization. However, Sandro brings a good point
regarding our own statement of Debian's purpose as a project. If De
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:03:16AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Roberto,
>
> On Thu 26 Mar 2020 at 09:51AM -04, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > Good point. The most recent experience I had with this was a package I
> > uploaded in February 2019. The FTP team rejec
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:42:34PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Roberto C. Sánchez (2020-03-26 14:28:47)
> > That said, I have never had a package rejected for reasons that would
> > outright keep it from entering Debian. Each package I have had
> > rejected
ough, I may be mistaken in that and
biased based on my own experience.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:55:08PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez: " Re: Failing GPG key (was: Re: Debian Project Leader
> election 2019: First call for votes)" (Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:03:43 -0400):
>
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 06:21:52PM +0
t therefore makes me, and only me, responsible to ensure that
I update the expiry when necessary to avoid problems.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 03:47:26PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez writes:
>
> > I suppose requiring that they be pull-mirrored to Salsa might make
> > sense, but requiring that the primary place of development for Debian
> > packaging actually b
ot involved with upstream might come along and
maintain these packages. In some cases that may be no great loss, but
there are enough upstream developers who are frustrated by Debian
policies it would seem to be better to be more accommodating, not less.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
36 matches
Mail list logo
