Re: Reaffirm public voting

2022-03-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, Le 04/03/2022 à 11:42, Holger Levsen a écrit : > The GR proposal for secret voting is silent on implenentation details, > probably because secret and transparent voting is, well, impossible to > achieve fully, [...] It is possible to achieve some reasonable level of secrecy and transparenc

Re: Amendment: Keep e-mail while allowing other options in addition [Re: GR: Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote]

2022-02-28 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/02/2022 à 23:22, Don Armstrong a écrit : >> I plan to look at least at belenios is voting by email is no longer >> required. My plan is to run at least a small test to see if people >> like it or not. I could maybe also run a larger poll. But we'll see >> about how we pick a different system,

Re: Call for vote - Diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-05-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/05/2012 00:28, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > I'll start the vote during the weekend. But I need to think about > the name of the option, I wasn't very happy with it when I wrote > that. Has the issue mentioned in [1] been taken into account? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/04/msg0

Re: Q for all candidates: license and copyright requirements

2010-03-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > I you would like to guarantee to the users that unpacked debian source > is DFSG we should hook into unpack (similar to DpkgSrc3.0 / quilt) and > remove DFSG blobs at maintainers discretion for example by parsing > debian/copyright. > [...] > This change will result in mai