2014-02-28 17:50 GMT+01:00 Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk:
Thue Janus Kristensen writes (Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and
later-no-harm):
I am not completely sure, but I think both ways accomplish the same
thing,
if you always only use the = criterium.
Actually
have a
model in my head to understand all the consequences.
Regards, Thue
2014-02-27 20:20 GMT+01:00 Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk:
Thue Janus Kristensen writes (Debian's custom use of Condorcet and
later-no-harm):
There is what I consider an unnecessary problem with later
From that discussion (
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2013/05/msg00012.html ),
Michael Ossipoff mentions a similar solution for the beat default
criterium problem as my suggestion, except for a different voting system:
Do a rank-balloting among all of the options, with D as one of the
There is what I consider an unnecessary problem with later-no-harm [1] in
Debian's use of the Condorcet voting method in the Debian Constitution
§A.6.3 [2].
The problem was visible in the recent CTTE init system vote, as noted by fx
Steve Langasek [3]. Given options
* systemd (D)
* upstart (U)
*
4 matches
Mail list logo
