On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:37:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 07:59:56PM +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> >
> > There is the possilbity to salavage the packagei [1], but that of course
> > will
> > only work if the person
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:32:45PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the light of the previous discussion I have a question to all voters.
> Due to bug #1066377 more than 30 testing removal warnings hit my mailbox
> today (I stopped counting after 30). While the Debian Med pac
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:00:26PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm looking seconds for this new proposal below, which is like
> proposal E plus *also* offering free installer image.
>
> Rationale: we should keep producing fully freely distributable
> Debian installer images, for those
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 07:10:24PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Le Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 02:37:49PM +, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> > Le Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:56:07AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
> > > Do you too agree with the position that having non-free firmware stored in
> > > your
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> My reason for using Debian is that I can rely on getting a 100% free
> system, and then add non-free works on top of it when I chose to do so.
>
> For example, I install the firmware-iwlwifi package on my laptop because
> I haven
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 08:19:26AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2022-09-10 at 09:16 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >
> >> So the practical problems facing people requiring non-free software
> >> appears solved or possible to solve.
> >
> > As I understand it th
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:48:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Between one thing and another I've not been tracking the timeline of this
> vote and I'm worried we may be out of time for new ballot options and
> possibly extensions.
>
> (As promised in the previous vote for changing the timing of
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:11:25PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> >
> > > I like to discussion about anything related to this, so that I can at
> > > least get an idea what the consensus is.
> >
> > DSC 1 and DSC 5 have som
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 12:32:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I hereby propose the following alternative text to Steve's original
> proposal.
>
> I'm only suggesting to modify the third paragraph, offering to produce
> two sets of images (fully-free and with-non-free-firmware), being the
> later
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 05:48:28PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Tobias Frost writes:
> That seems incorrect. Here is a quote from the proposal:
>
> We will include non-free firmware packages from the
> "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our offi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 07:39:21AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Ansgar writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 16:23 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> >> Do we need to update the Debian Social Contract for that?
> >> Specifically paragraph 1, which currently reads
> >>
> >> Debian will remain 10
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi a11!
>
> I'm proposing to change how we handle non-free firmware in
> Debian. I've written about this a few times already this year [1, 2]
> and I ran a session on the subject at DebConf [3].
>
> TL;DR: The way we deal with
>
>I'm yet to be convinced that there exists anyone that would be upset by
>the fact that our security team might abide by embargoes in supposed
>defiance of 'not hide problems'. I am also not convinced that if there
>does exist such a person, and they are capable of becoming upset enough
>about it to be driven away from Debian, that that would be a great
>loss.
>
>Cheers, Phil.
Seems that topic has been previously discussed already:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=129604
(just came across that bug by purechange yesterday)
--
Tobias Frost
GPG fingerprint: 13C9 04F0 CE08 5E7C 3630 7985 DECF 849A A635 7FB7
Am Freitag, den 08.07.2016, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
> The Debian Constitution is very well written, in a way that is almost
> completely
> ungendered. The only gendered word left is the Chairman of the
> Technical
> Committee. There is no reason for this position to be gendered.
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 16:05 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call
> for seconds. This GR resolution proposal is identical to that
> proposed by Matthew Vernon in March:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/03/msg0.html
> and th
15 matches
Mail list logo
