On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:20:52PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Do you really think we should change an old and overall good format?
It's not a "format", it's an introductory text. There is no negative aspect
in making it a bit more logical and user-friendly, why are you making change
sound like a
Hi,
OK, another draft, now incorporating the last two
suggestions. I added a mention of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] location.
Now, GR votes have different wording: the full text of the
GR and amendments is included if it is short, or a pointer is put in
for the vote page otherwise
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:59:03PM -0500]:
> > Well, I don't think that's really important to the typical user -
> > people just want to know about the part they have to send back
> > in. Whether you call this "the ballot" or "the part of the ballot you
> > have edit in order to
On Sunday 13 April 2008 16:25:40 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that is
> in the Debian keyring. The voting software (Devotee) accepts mail that
> either contains only an unmangled OpenPGP message (RFC 2440 compliant),
> or a PGP/MIME mail
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:25:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> b) move the address to send the ballot to up front, where we mention
>it.
Good idea, and it can't hurt to repeat it.
Maybe also warn against group-replies? I personally think that we should
discourage such public voting, but
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:45:55 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Here it is - with some other changes while I was at it. (I also
> couldn't find the references to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CFVs. Should
> there be some?)
I guess. It seemed pointless before, since you already hav
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:12:20 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Well, I don't think that's really important to the typical user -
> people just want to know about the part they have to send back
> in. Whether you call this "the ballot" or "the part of the ballot you
> have edit in ord
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 23:45 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> --
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Suggesting to vote for "Choice 2: John Doe 2" ? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:12:20PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Can you present a sample ballot for, say, DPL election 2009? It
> > might help to see a full ballot and compare the points of difference.
>
> Will do (in another mail).
Here it is - with some other changes while I was at it.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:51:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I propose that you make the beginning look like this:
>
> > HOW TO VOTE
>
> > First, read the full text of [...variable data...]
>
> > The ballot is a small text form that is included below. It is cast
> > by sending a fi
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:44:09 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Huh. Looking at the ballot: , | ... | Do not erase anything
>> between the lines below and do not change the | choice names.
> Yes, you see, that's the point - the text just starts talking about
> not erasing somet
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:40:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If you think the vote period is too short, then I suppose there
> is the option to see if other
> people consider it so too, and see if you can redo some of the
> constitutional amendment that was passed by acclaim last y
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:46:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:44:12 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > But I see how it would help if the CFV was more verbose about that,
> > and less verbose about other things. It goes on and on about the
> > technica
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:44:12 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> But I see how it would help if the CFV was more verbose about that,
> and less verbose about other things. It goes on and on about the
> technicalities of the vote, and says to read the platforms twice
> (because the read
TECTED]>
>> Date: Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:02 AM
>> Subject: Ballot for leader2008
>> To: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The mail was processed an hour after the vote ended. Surprise,
mail is not a synchronous protocol.
>> Hi,
>> No b
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:15:55AM +0100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Especially when the instructions for requesting a ballot are
> frustrating incomplete and this was processed after the the cut-off.
>
> Who knew that attempting to engage an automated system from 21:54 GMT
> onwards in order to receiv
well.
Anand.
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:02 AM
Subject: Ballot for leader2008
To: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
No ballot found for leader2008.
Hope this helps,
Debian Project secre
17 matches
Mail list logo
