Debian Project Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting point. It all depends on the definition
of what a resolution is, and whether a resolution can have multiple
options, or not. I consider a resolution to be a formal expression of
the opinion or will of an
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:27:28AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Debian Project Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting point. It all depends on the definition
of what a resolution is, and whether a resolution can have multiple
options, or not. I consider a resolution to
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:05:34AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Moin,
On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for
60 days or more
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:07:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:05:34AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Moin,
On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
When ever a package in Debian
On Mon, Oct 27 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
Debian Project Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an interesting point. It all depends on the definition
of what a resolution is, and whether a resolution can have multiple
options, or not. I consider a resolution to be a formal expression
Moin,
On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for
60 days or more
besides that this proposal still has at least the problem of who determines
how (that the DFSG has been violated) I have been thinking that
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:05:34AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Moin,
On Saturday 25 October 2008 20:31, Robert Millan wrote:
When ever a package in Debian is found to have been violating the DFSG for
60 days or more
besides that this proposal still has at least the problem of who
On Sat, Oct 25 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:37:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Nevertheless I would merge it in my proposal if you still want me to.
If we must have a GR, I would feel
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:37:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Nevertheless I would merge it in my proposal if you still want me to.
If we must have a GR, I would feel better with these options on
the ballot.
Okay then. Here's the new ballot including your proposed options.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:37:52PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Nevertheless I would merge it in my proposal if you still want me to.
If we must have a GR, I would feel better with these options on
the ballot.
10 matches
Mail list logo
