On Sat Jan 10 15:51, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > How do you define "relevant"? The vote is run because someome proposed a
> > > GR and X others have seconded it. They are relevant, it happened due to
> > > them. Now as a voter I want to know their motivati
On Fri, 09 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > How do you define "relevant"? The vote is run because someome proposed a
> > GR and X others have seconded it. They are relevant, it happened due to
> > them. Now as a voter I want to know their motivation and would like to
> > have a link to mail where t
[ Moving the discussion to -project. Please do remember to drop -vote from the
recipients list if you follow up. ]
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Your lawerish-like interpretation of everything that happens in Debian
> >
> > (I assume that was a typo for
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Coming up with a new Oracle (was: Re: First call
for votes for the Lenny release GR)"):
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [Raphael:]
> > > I agree with the intent but I don't agree with the list of persons you
>
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > - To help voters choose, the following people should be able to
> > >require the Secretary to quote on each GR ballot form a URL
> > >of their choice, to be used by them for disseminating their vews on
> > >the vote:
> > >The Propos
Clint Adams writes ("Re: Coming up with a new Oracle (was: Re: First call for
votes for the Lenny release GR)"):
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The constitution should really be clear so that interpretation is almost
> >
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Coming up with a new Oracle (was: Re: First call
for votes for the Lenny release GR)"):
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > - The Secretary should explicitly have the power to delay a GR
> >vote by up to (say) two
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:09:52AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The constitution should really be clear so that interpretation is almost
> never needed.
Agreed.
> We should fix the constitution so that we can leave the duty of
> interpreting the constitution to the secretary.
Agreed.
> We ju
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> The GR ballot should only give the URL on vote.debian.org where you would
> find links behind each proposer/seconder. Ideally those links point
> directly to the debian-vote archive so that it lets people jump into
> discussions directly and form their own opinion.
I th
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> The big goal, for me at least, and hopefully for the other participants, is an
> eventual agreement on what the constitution says, or alternatively, a broadly
> accepted amendment of the constitution that clarifies unclear matters and
> settles t
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:07:08PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Can we stop this absurd discussion/reasoning?
I don't believe it is absurd. But reading some of the private replies I've
already got to my other mail, it seems my motivation for this discussion has
not been obvious.
To me, this d
11 matches
Mail list logo
