Re: DPL Debate Extra Questions

2006-03-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 01:49]: > I think we really should be asking some of these questions throughout > the year, instead of jammed into a brief 3 week period. I agree. I actually wanted to express someting like this but I know it didn't came across. What I wanted to sa

Re: DPL Debate Extra Questions

2006-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-19 02:15]: > > I don't know if the candidates wish to answer these outside of the > > campaign period or not, but if they wish to, feel free. > > I hope they will collectively agree not to. Surely 3 weeks o

Re: DPL Debate Extra Questions

2006-03-19 Thread Ari Pollak
Ari: What will the cabal do to heat its coffee without flamewars? I don't know, you'll have to ask the cabal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DPL Debate Extra Questions

2006-03-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-19 02:15]: > I don't know if the candidates wish to answer these outside of the > campaign period or not, but if they wish to, feel free. I hope they will collectively agree not to. Surely 3 weeks of questions should be enough for all of us. Some of t

DPL Debate Extra Questions

2006-03-19 Thread Don Armstrong
I don't know if the candidates wish to answer these outside of the campaign period or not, but if they wish to, feel free. [For some reason we always seem to have a traditional moratorium on answering questions during the voting period... never quite figured out why.] Jeroen: How will you persona