Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
In contrast with what we require for the software we distribute, we are
forbidding to use some of our logos for profit. While there are some clear
differences between software and carriers of visual identity, I feel that
there
is a strong mismatch
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:47:27AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
I would like to know your position or vision on our trademarks and logos, and,
if you indend to work on that question as a DPL, what would be the key points
of your action.
Stefano has already given an overview of the
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:47:27AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
In contrast with what we require for the software we distribute, we are
forbidding to use some of our logos for profit. While there are some clear
differences between software and carriers of visual identity, I feel that
there
Dear Wouter, Gergely and Stefano,
one of the conditions for a work to be considered free is to allow others to
use it without making contribution back to the original authors (even if we
whish everybody would do when they can). In the non-free section of our
archive, we therefore have software
4 matches
Mail list logo
