On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 12:28:27PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
would be made publicly available. Also, the
a href=vote_002_tally.txttally sheet/a
Oops, that should have been vote_003_tally.txt.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
Okay, here's a new draft with the following changes: [...]
Okay, as per A.2 I'm calling for a vote on this. TTBOMK there aren't any
related proposals or amendments to add to the ballot, so it should take
the form:
[ ] Choice 1:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that: [...]
So one thing that I wrote about originally [0], that I don't think I've
repeated much, is that ultimately I look at this as
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
Debian Maintainers Proposal
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers keyring.
It will be
On 27.06.2007 13:41 schrieb Anthony Towns:
Seconds, comments or amendments appreciated.
Since some people seem to prefer a simpler solution without a DM class
but simply limited upload rights (as you proposed for the DMs) for NMs
after a certain point in their NM career, I wonder how many
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class, and only
then issue a GR outlining how the practicalities will be handled (if
needed). There is also an
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class, and only
then issue a GR outlining how the
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class,
Hi,
On 27/06/07 at 12:41 +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
5) The intial policy for the use of the Debian Maintainer keyring with the
Debian archive will be to accept uploads signed by a key in that keyring
provided:
[...]
* the Maintainer: field of the uploaded .changes file
I second the proposal quoted below.
Debian Maintainers Proposal
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers keyring.
It will be initially maintained by:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:18:31PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 27/06/07 at 12:41 +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
5) The intial policy for the use of the Debian Maintainer keyring with the
Debian archive will be to accept uploads signed by a key in that keyring
provided:
[...]
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Well, effectively the DM /could/ sponsor uploads of their own package by
using -m, though that seems unnecessarily convoluted to me anyway.
At that point the difference between sponsoring an upload and applying
a patch someone
Okay, here's a new draft with the following changes:
- incorporate committers by name rather than by relevant
qualifications
- split committers into expected active committers and reserve
committers
- mention tools expected to be used, but don't require them even
I second the proposal below.
also sprach Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.06.27.1341 +0200]:
Okay, here's a new draft with the following changes:
- incorporate committers by name rather than by relevant
qualifications
- split committers into expected active committers
On 6/27/07, Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here's a new draft with the following changes:
- incorporate committers by name rather than by relevant
qualifications
- split committers into expected active committers and reserve
committers
- mention tools
I second the proposal below.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
Debian Maintainers Proposal
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian
On 27.06.2007 13:41 schrieb Anthony Towns:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers keyring.
It will be initially maintained by:
* Anthony Towns (proposer, ftpmaster, jetring developer)
* Joey Hess (jetring developer)
...
* Brian Nelson (n-m
On Wednesday 27 June 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
Why don't we just grant some of those rights you're proposing for DMs to
our NM's after a certain point in their NM career? That would in my
opinion instantly help and motivate fare more people than the new DM
class will ever do.
current
Hi,
I second the GR proposal quoted below.
Cheers,
Moritz
=3D=3D=3D=3D Debian Maintainers Proposal =3D=3D=3D=3D
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers
I second the below proposal.
BTW, s/intial/initial/.
Debian Maintainers Proposal
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers keyring.
It will be
I second the proposal below.
Cheers,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
Debian Maintainers Proposal
The Debian Project endorses the concept of Debian Maintainers with
limited access, and resolves that:
1) A new keyring will be created, called the Debian maintainers
I second the following proposal.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
Okay, here's a new draft with the following changes:
- incorporate committers by name rather than by relevant
qualifications
- split committers into expected active committers and
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:41 +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
Debian Maintainers Proposal
I welcome the idea of enabling people to work on Debian, but it seems to
me that this proposal (even with the latest changes) mixes some
concepts, that it creates more work, and duplicates some work
Fabian Fagerholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] After that, the applicant could
apply for the ability to upload already-sponsored packages, and leave it
at that. The key would be added to the keyring (a separate keyring if
needed for technical reasons).
If the applicant wanted, they could
24 matches
Mail list logo
