On sam, 2007-06-30 at 16:30 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> It would probably be helpful to clean the listing from those in NM.
I guess I know a way to "clean" them :)
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:16:47PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:25:56PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
> > > If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like t
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:30:46PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Thanks to Felipe, the lists of possible candidates are now public. See:
> > > * list of non-DD Maintainers or Uploaders, sorted by the number of
> > >
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
> > > If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
> > > well, if you don't mind.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks to Felipe, the lists of possible c
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:25:56PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
> > If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
> > well, if you don't mind.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Felipe
On 28/06/07 at 05:49 +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Yes, please sent it, I'll publish it somewhere.
> If you are not too ashamed of your scripts, I'd like to see them as
> well, if you don't mind.
Hi,
Thanks to Felipe, the lists of possible candidates are now public. See:
* list of non-DD Mainta
On 27/06/07 at 21:42 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Anthony Towns wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> >> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
> >> >>
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Anthony Towns wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> >> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
>> >> able to tell you the right number.
>> >
>> > TTBOMK, the real ke
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:03:36PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:58:13PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Notes: package should generally be co-maintained by sponsor and non-DD
> > > maintainer, with the non-DD maintainer doing most of the work
> > If you restrict
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 21:29, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > > > However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers o
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 21:29, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > > However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
> > > interested people is large.
> > F
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:58:13PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Notes: package should generally be co-maintained by sponsor and non-DD
> > maintainer, with the non-DD maintainer doing most of the work
> If you restrict this use case to that specific case, then you won't
> have a lot of can
Hi Anthony,
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 21:29, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
> > interested people is large.
>
> FWIW, I'm happy to put the work into this even if not many pe
On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
> >> able to tell you the right number.
> >
> > TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 27 juin 2007, vers 01:06, Paul
Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I'm a fairly active (non-DD) member of the Java Packaging team, and I
> also maintain a couple of non-Java packages. Although I'm starting to
> become reasonably skilled at Java packaging,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
> interested people is large.
I suspect one reason that this thread hasn't resulted in many people
expressing an interest is that non-DDs tend not to read debian-vot
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
>> able to tell you the right number.
>
> TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
>
> merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyr
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> However, like Pierre, I'm not convinced that the numbers of actually
> interested people is large.
FWIW, I'm happy to put the work into this even if not many people end
up using it.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
> able to tell you the right number.
TTBOMK, the real keyring can be obtained by ssh by DDs, at
merkel:/srv/keyring.debian.org/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg
and via anonymous
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Do we have any numbers on how many non-DD maintainers we have? I'm part of
> that group, but how large a group is this?
A very long one-liner[1] gets me 992 in the main unstable archive. Of course
the number is different since the debian-keyring in the unstable
Hi!
* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070626 13:51]:
> There are about 2100 unique email address in the Maintainer: and
> Uploaders: field in the unstable Sources files. That counts mailing
> lists and potentially multiple alternate addresses for DDs as well as
> non-DD maintainers of course.
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
>> around for some time now [...]
>> I've used terms like "initial policy" quite a bit -- [...]
>
> Shortly before
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 10:13:31AM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Do we have any numbers on how many non-DD maintainers we have? I'm part of
> that group, but how large a group is this?
There are about 2100 unique email address in the Maintainer: and
Uploaders: field in the unstable S
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> > == N-M Delays
>
> This one suck, because NM delays are mostly fixeable, and DM will just
> make them not painful at all for DD, depriving the system to be fixed.
> This is exactly the use case I fear.
>
> That's why I'd like
On Monday 25 June 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> == Sponsored Maintainers =
>
> For packages that're maintained by non-DDs on an ongoing basis via
> sponsored uploads, DM status provides the sponsor with the opportunity
> to change the upload priveleges from "default-deny" to "default-allow"
> on
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> == Upstream Maintainers ==
[...]
> Authorised by: Existing maintainer
> Notes: package should be co-maintained by maintainer and upstream, upstream
> generally to be expected to be uploading code changes rather than
> packaging changes
I'm not su
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> == N-M queue =
> Authorised by: AM
This one makes sense. I'd also add the sponsor in the people giving
the ACK.
> == Sponsored Maintainers =
> Authorised by: Sponsor
> Notes: package should generally be co-ma
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Shortly before leaving DebConf someone (whose name I've forgotten,
> sadly) suggested that some sample use cases for the DM process might be
> useful. Here's some that come to my mind:
Another use case that I'd like to mention is the Ubuntu maintain
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So here's a proposal for the Debian Maintainers idea that's been floating
> around for some time now [...]
> I've used terms like "initial policy" quite a bit -- [...]
Shortly before leaving DebConf someone (whose name I've forgotten
29 matches
Mail list logo
