and I believe that each case
> > should be examined separately, with the delegate in question, and with
> > the rest of the team.
>
> There is some sort of autarchic trait in DPL delegations that I've never
> liked very much. Due to the volunteer nature of Debian and to ou
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 06:15:46PM +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> A way around that would be to use time-limited delegations *only*.
> Q: What do the candidates think of that idea? If you agree it'd be good,
> would do you engage in doing so for the duration of your term?
&g
t make everybody feel more
> > enabled/empowered to solve problems that are usually deferred to the
> > DPL, which could be a good thing.
>
> without DPL, there would be no DPL delegations. I have a question for you
> related to delegations.
>
> When a delegate is com
he team.
There is some sort of autarchic trait in DPL delegations that I've never
liked very much. Due to the volunteer nature of Debian and to our
understandable desire of not having the DPL "mess up" with teams, every
time the DPL delegates someone there is a risk of creating a
self-perpet
ore
> > enabled/empowered to solve problems that are usually deferred to the
> > DPL, which could be a good thing.
>
> Hi Lucas and Neil,
>
> without DPL, there would be no DPL delegations. I have a question for you
> related to delegations.
>
> When a delegate
the
> DPL, which could be a good thing.
Hi Lucas and Neil,
without DPL, there would be no DPL delegations. I have a question for you
related to delegations.
When a delegate is completely inactive as a delegate, do you think that his
delegation should be renewed ?
Have a nice day,
--
Ch
Le Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:13:23AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> What do you think of this and would you be ready to withdraw a delegation
> for a delegate that behaved badly towards another DD (even outside of his
> delegated role), that has been warned once by you and that did it again
>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:09:18PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > What are you referring to here when you write "Code of Conduct"? Do you
> > mean the Debian Community Guidelines (as I guess), or rather
> > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct ?
>
> Yes, the Community Guidelin
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:13:23AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> another question to all candidates (this question is inspired by a recent
> event).
Could you comment on what event, exactly, you are talking about?
(Don't feel too compelled to if you believe this would unnecessa
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:10:23AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>> A new Code of Conduct has already been drafted, but it has never been
>> put into practice.
>
> What are you referring to here when you write "Code of Conduct"? Do y
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:10:23AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> A new Code of Conduct has already been drafted, but it has never been
> put into practice.
What are you referring to here when you write "Code of Conduct"? Do you
mean the Debian Community Guidelines (as I guess), or rather
htt
dy discussed in another thread my intended personal balance), the
DPL cannot *force* such decision on delegates. I'm convinced that in
most cases the DPL has alternative levers though: for instance the DPL
can communicate _in place_ of the delegates (giving proper credit), can
pose a kind of
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Most of you have answered that it's not possible to regulate the heated
> discussions but it's possible to set a good example. If only the leader
> behaves properly, it will still be difficult to make the climate change.
> But if all the d
Hello,
another question to all candidates (this question is inspired by a recent
event).
Most of you have answered that it's not possible to regulate the heated
discussions but it's possible to set a good example. If only the leader
behaves properly, it will still be difficult to make the climate
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> | The Delegates are appointed by the Project Leader and may be replaced by
^^
> | the Leader at the Leader's discretion.
^
has
no basis.
> Those are pretty extreme differences, and it makes sense for people to
> prefer to be come under the heading of "maintainer" in that it gives
> them more certainty in fulfilling the role; and given DPLs have
> traditionally been fairly reticent about managin
gives them more certainty
in fulfilling the role; and given DPLs have traditionally been fairly
reticent about managing delegations, it's also how things have tended
to work in practice.
In the end, I don't think the difference is that important -- whether your
a maintainer or a dele
17 matches
Mail list logo
