Given that this is supposed to be the discussion period, I'd like to share
my standpoint regarding one option.
Andreas Barth wrote:
> | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
> | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making
> | case-by-case-decis
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:29:35PM +, Frans Pop wrote:
> We've already had two releases where this was an issue and in both cases
> it was decided by a GR. Why should the current release team think they
> could handle it differently?
Maybe because in http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Given that this is supposed to be the discussion period, I'd like to share
> my standpoint regarding one option.
>
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
> > | all these goals
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:10:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> I would welcome a more permanent answer to the firmware question,
> really, I'm not really pleased with the trolls that arise on the subject
> prior to every release.
May I ask who are those "trolls" you refer to?
--
Robert Mi
Le lundi 17 novembre 2008 à 16:04 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:10:07AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >
> > I would welcome a more permanent answer to the firmware question,
> > really, I'm not really pleased with the trolls that arise on the subject
> > prior to ev
5 matches
Mail list logo
