Hi,
Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. Any
comments need to be in fast, though.
manoj
Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, 10th September, 2006
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, 23rd September, 2006.
The following bal
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. Any
> comments need to be in fast, though.
Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please?
"Amend the constitution" is not descriptive enough.
Thanks,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://pe
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, MJ Ray wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. Any
> > comments need to be in fast, though.
>
> Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the
> constitution" is not descriptive enough.
It's
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the
> > constitution" is not descriptive enough.
>
> Since there is only one issue where voting is open, anyone
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:28:15 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Previously, the proposal has been named on the ballot, such as:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/03/msg3.html
Very short proposal, so full text was on the ballot as
well. Also, more than a up/
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. Any comments
>> need to be in fast, though.
> Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the
> constitution" is not d
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. Any comments
>> need to be in fast, though.
> Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "Amend the
> constitution" is not d
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Apparently, the proposer and the secretary both felt that the
> form on the ballot was OK -- or do you have a better idea what the
> proposer of the GR wanted? [...]
If only the proposer and secretary need to be happy with the ballot,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:56:02 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Note that this is a draft, voting is not yet open. Any comments
>>> need to be in fast, though.
>
>> Could you name the amendment on the ballot, please? "
9 matches
Mail list logo