Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-07 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op vr, 04-03-2005 te 12:48 +, schreef MJ Ray: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, it doesn't work that way. The translators come to the d-i and > > translation team and ask what they can do to help get it translated. > > I think this is tied up with the change of installer. It m

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-05 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:48:50AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Is that 65% for the d-i in the next release, or d-i current? That > still leaves a third excluded and d-i is *much* better than most, far > more widely translated more than most of debian. There's a lot of > other things to improve too.

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-05 Thread MJ Ray
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Notice that there is already an effort on this subject going on in > debian-esperanto, and you would have known about it if you had been subscribed > to this list, i guess you are more than welcome to join that effort. Notice that I am a (minor) part in tha

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:48:26PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, it doesn't work that way. The translators come to the d-i and > > translation team and ask what they can do to help get it translated. > > I think this is tied up with the change of installer

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:48:26PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, it is not that people think esperanto is not significant enough, but > > rather than nobody interested in esperanto cared enough early enough in the > > process to get it supported. > > I don't

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-04 Thread MJ Ray
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, it doesn't work that way. The translators come to the d-i and > translation team and ask what they can do to help get it translated. I think this is tied up with the change of installer. It makes it a bit tricky to figure out who could have done anyth

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-04 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:48:50AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There were multiple announcemnts and as much time as possible before > > closing the set of supported languages for sarge d-i. > > Where were these announcements? Sorry, I had asked > previously and

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-03 Thread MJ Ray
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There were multiple announcemnts and as much time as possible before > closing the set of supported languages for sarge d-i. Where were these announcements? Sorry, I had asked previously and was told there has been no official announcement, which I had no rea

Re: Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-03 Thread Joey Hess
MJ Ray wrote: > The debian-installer developers are working on probably the > single biggest improvement to debian access for years, making > it easier to install, but some languages that were in the old > installer are not in the new one and the list has been closed > for the next release with ver

Exclusion, was: Clarification about krooger's platform

2005-03-03 Thread MJ Ray
Jonathan Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MJ Ray wrote: > >Why should the sex imbalance be seen as any more urgent than race, > >culture or any of the other tons of ways debian is demographically > >different? > Debian already has a debian-women mailing list for discussing such > issues. This