Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-03-04 Thread Juan Manuel Garcia Molina
binI0FS56DJbo.bin Description: application/pgp-encrypted msg.asc Description: Binary data

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-28 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:00:54AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/10820 And the second quote is from: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please also not the text immediately following the cited p

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Raul Miller
[On 2/27/06, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the way these choices are proposed to you is misleading, I have > to sent this specifying message to you all. Without passing judgement, I'll note that a statement like this demands well stated proof. [...eliding background material..

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Helen Faulkner said: > Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > [...] > > > The Project Secretary is the author of the text that was used as a > > basis for the proposal in Choice 1. Of course as a sympathiser of a > > position somewhat opposite to my position it comes natural to h

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Helen Faulkner
Anton Zinoviev wrote: [...] > The Project Secretary is the author of the text that was used as a > basis for the proposal in Choice 1. Of course as a sympathiser of a > position somewhat opposite to my position it comes natural to him to > try to oppose my proposal[2]. Nevertheless during the d

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:21:00PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > 25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5 > [ ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases > [ ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Enrico Zini
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ops, mistake. Which in a way was good because I noticed a mistake in my choice

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Enrico Zini
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:21:00PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > 25a628e9-d88e-40b7-8e1c-888cff421ea5 > [ 1 ] Choice 1: GFDL-licensed works are unsuitable for main in all cases > [ 2 ] Choice 2: GFDL-licensed w

First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-25 Thread Debian Project Secretary
Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, 26th February, 2006 Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, 11th March, 2006. The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to address the Debian project's position on the GNU Free Documentation License. The