* Osamu Aoki [Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:22:11 +0900]:
Thus, let me propose an amendment to Adeodato Simó's proposal:
s/include no invariant sections/don't include any significant contents
to prevent our Freedom in invariant sections/ and matching changes to
the text.
In case it's necessary:
Le Dim 12 Février 2006 02:22, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
Hi,
I second Adeodato Simó's proposal but at the same time I consider it
still leaves some spaces for the absolutism interpretation which
tends to plague Debian. I consider we should have reasonable space
for judgment for many things in
also sprach Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.12.0222 +0100]:
s/include no invariant sections/don't include any significant contents
to prevent our Freedom in invariant sections/ and matching changes to
the text.
I think this sounds incredibly vague and leaves significant up in
the air
Hi,
I second Adeodato Simó's proposal but at the same time I consider it
still leaves some spaces for the absolutism interpretation which tends
to plague Debian. I consider we should have reasonable space for
judgment for many things in life.
Let's consider a documentation written in the SGML
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:22:11 +0900, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
GFDL blah, blah,...
Invariant section being following comment section in SGML
!--
chapter 1: author1_name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chapter 2: author2_name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[...]
This cannot be an invariant
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:14:22PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:22:11 +0900, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
GFDL blah, blah,...
Invariant section being following comment section in SGML
!--
chapter 1: author1_name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chapter 2:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:58:14AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:14:22PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:22:11 +0900, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
GFDL blah, blah,...
Invariant section being following comment section in SGML
!--
7 matches
Mail list logo
