Hi,
The results of the General Resolution is that the diversity
statement has been accepted.
The details of the results shall soon be available at:
http://vote.debian.org/2012/vote_002
In the mean time the results are also available at:
http://master.debian.org/~secretary/diversity/results.txt
h
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the General Resolution about
a diversity statement.
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Sunday, May 20th, 2012
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, June 2nd, 2012
The following ballot is for voting on a diversity stateme
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx , 2012-05-08,
> 23:28:
> >http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
>
> Hmm. According to this page, the proposal[0] was seconded by Steve
> Langasek. However, Steve seconded only the draft[1], which has
> different
* Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx , 2012-05-08,
23:28:
http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
Hmm. According to this page, the proposal[0] was seconded by Steve
Langasek. However, Steve seconded only the draft[1], which has different
wording.
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vo
* Stefano Zacchiroli , 2012-05-09, 00:15:
considering that the resolution procedure already takes into account
"make changes to correct minor errors (for example, typographical
errors or inconsistencies) or changes which do not alter the meaning,
providing noone objects within 24 hours",
The
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:21:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I hope that our constitution has the answer to that question. If a GR needed
> self-locking dispositions, that would go against the idea of having a
> constitution at all. My personal opinion is that for things that
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:15:42AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> That would not stop to publish stuff like translations of the statement
> on www.debian.org , pretty much as the fact that the Constitution itself
> has been published upon hasn't (luckily!) stopped translation of it to
Le Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:57:40PM -0400, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
>
> Q: What will be the procedure for maintaining/updating the statement,
> once voted?
> A: The gist of the statement will be fixed by the GR. But in order to
> avoid needing a vote for every minor tweak, language
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:57:40PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> So, in order to have a definitive conclusion on this matter, shouldn't
> it be included in the actual GR text, or as an alternative, or as an
> amendment?
The only text subject to vote is the one that will be in the GR.
Everything
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new General Resolution has been started about a diversity
> statement.
>
> More details are at:
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
Question on procedure:
The initiating GR mail included the following
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:28:31PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt
Roeckx wrote:
> A new General Resolution has been started about a diversity
> statement.
>
> More details are at:
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002
Considering that the statement contained in the GR is the result
11 matches
Mail list logo
