-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Time Line: Proposal and amendment Tuessday, July 13^th, 2004 -> 2004
Discussion Period: Tuessday, July 13^th, 2004 -> 2004
Voting Period2004 -> 2004
Proposal 1 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL P
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:00:24AM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> Time Line: Proposal and amendment Tuessday, July 13^th, 2004 -> 2004
>Discussion Period: Tuessday, July 13^th, 2004 -> 2004
> Voting Period2004 -> 2004
>
>
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040720 17:55]:
> I think it is extremely unwise to set a precedent of overriding
> technical decisions for essentially political reasons, and I do not
> think that the release management team should view this pending vote as
> a blocking issue for sarge.
>
> I w
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like my objections to be registered on the ballot somehow, but I
> don't really have time to put together an amendment. Can anybody help
> here?
Something like
Proposal X: Include the AMD64 architechture into Sid
The actual text of
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 18:28 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040720 17:55]:
> > I think it is extremely unwise to set a precedent of overriding
> > technical decisions for essentially political reasons, and I do not
> > think that the release management team should
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:28:04PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040720 17:55]:
> > I think it is extremely unwise to set a precedent of overriding
> > technical decisions for essentially political reasons, and I do not
> > think that the release management team
On 2004-07-20 18:29:06 +0100 Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What's with the absurd pseudo-EU-government formatting? You realise
it's normally used to make documents harder to read, and thereby
discourage participation?
I believe it's normally used to cram as much as possible within th
7 matches
Mail list logo
