Op ma, 07-03-2005 te 02:09 +, schreef MJ Ray:
Arguing in favour of so-called positive discrimination is just
another case of ignoring present crimes by past-persecuted people.
I cannot agree more with that statement; positive discrimination is
just discrimination like anything else, and
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
They're trying to find out why women aren't as actively involved in
Debian as are men, so that they can remedy any problems, should those
arise.
I support them doing that.
In doing so, it isn't unreasonable to see what women currently
involved
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You haven't said anything sexist about it, except that it has a clear
purpose.
I have, IMO. I consider discrimination on the basis of sex to be sexism.
I've also described an incident of unchallenged racism on the
debian-women list. While I believe
You haven't said anything sexist about it, except that it has a clear
purpose.
I have, IMO. I consider discrimination on the basis of sex to be sexism.
i.e., you favour the law of the jungle. Which, may I say, has a fine
history of maintaining artificial imbalances caused by past
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have, IMO. I consider discrimination on the basis of sex to be sexism.
i.e., you favour the law of the jungle. Which, may I say, has a fine
history of maintaining artificial imbalances caused by past injustices.
No, I favour stopping discrimination and
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:09:26AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have, IMO. I consider discrimination on the basis of sex to be sexism.
i.e., you favour the law of the jungle. Which, may I say, has a fine
history of maintaining artificial imbalances caused by
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:09:26AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Arguing in favour of so-called positive discrimination is just
another case of ignoring present crimes by past-persecuted people.
We have to learn from the past and overcome mistakes, not relive
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a women-only web page?
A page about people that only admits contributions from women.
Where is the list charter for debian-women women-only?
Being about or by women are the only topicality criteria for debian-women,
last I saw.
--
To
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is a women-only web page?
A page about people that only admits contributions from women.
What's the URL, please?
Where is the list charter for debian-women women-only?
Being about or by women are the
Is it possible to just chill out on the chicks? Can't the girls brave enough
to wade into our computerized backwater have a little something of their own
without all this trouble?
The very few women in Debian put up a page that lists those women and men
aren't listed on it because it is a
Ean Schuessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to just chill out on the chicks? [...]
It's just an example of some general problems (and not one I raised).
Would you have a problem with blind Debianers creating such a list? Nazis or
terrorists sure, but ladies!?! [...]
For at least
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, your complaint is about a topic restriction, not a
restriction on who is allowed to address that topic.
Cool, so declaring all discussions and collaboration involving
women off-topic for debian-www would be fine with you?
--
To
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:55:49AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A page about people that only admits contributions from women.
What's the URL, please?
http://women.alioth.debian.org/profiles/
I have a page that only
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, your complaint is about a topic restriction, not a
restriction on who is allowed to address that topic.
Cool, so declaring all discussions and collaboration involving
women off-topic for debian-www
Sorry, this is definitely OT for -vote. But I wanted to clarify the
follwing comment, which has been made repeatedly on this thread, incase
anyone is actually wondering about it.
MJ Ray wrote:
I think it's a problem that most of the points under how to
avoid being sexist haven't actually been
Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are four points. Of those, three are being done already, namely
^^
the first [1],[2] third [3][4][5] and fourth [6]. There are many other
such references on the Debian Women webpages and
16 matches
Mail list logo
