Le Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:06:53PM +0200, Robert Millan a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:03:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > Since such GR would go through the usual procedure, I don't think asserting
> > that there will be a second GR needs to be part of this GR. In fact, it may
>
On 24/10/08 at 01:34 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear all,
>
> as others I am concerned that pushing for changes on the procedures for
> becoming a member of Debian, using a top-down approach and no time
> frame, will result in suboptimal rul
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:03:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 01:34:42AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > 2) After the next stable release, a general resolution will be used to
> > decide on the procedures for becoming a member of the Debian project.
> >
> > -
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 01:34:42AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> 2) After the next stable release, a general resolution will be used to
> decide on the procedures for becoming a member of the Debian project.
>
> - ---
Since such GR would go thr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
as others I am concerned that pushing for changes on the procedures for
becoming a member of Debian, using a top-down approach and no time
frame, will result in suboptimal rules that will dissatisfy many. I
therefore propose the following re
Dear all,
as others I am concerned that pushing for changes on the procedures for
becoming a member of Debian, using a top-down approach and no time
frame, will result in suboptimal rules that will dissatisfy many. I
therefore propose the following resolution.
6 matches
Mail list logo
