* MJ Ray:
> Nearly all messages sent to debian-private are covered by copyright
> and I think republishing any such past message could get Debian into
> legal trouble, in general, unless there's explicit permission from its
> author. If someone has a good global argument against that, please post
* Kalle Kivimaa:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Some of these issues are certainly unfixed, and very, very few might
>> even be unpublished. It's unlikely that one of those has been sent to
>> Debian, though.
>
> And if it has been sent to Debian and ignored, I'd say that our Soc
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...] And as you can see from the proposal, we all
> have a veto on the declassification [...]
There is no *veto* in the proposal. There is a limited opportunity
for the message author to object and otherwise a GR can be used
- which would be possible anyway if
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I also worry about security reports that include personally
> identifiable information, trade (business?) secrets or copyrighted
> material, which are not really relevant to the bug itself, but were
> sent in with the expectation that this was a typical vendor s
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some of these issues are certainly unfixed, and very, very few might
> even be unpublished. It's unlikely that one of those has been sent to
> Debian, though.
And if it has been sent to Debian and ignored, I'd say that our Social
Contract _mandates_ us
* Daniel Ruoso:
>> This distinction is important because for years, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> was an aliases for debian-private, and people who sent mail to that
>> address might be very surprised that it's subject to declassification
>> (and that it was sent to hundreds of Debian developers in the fir
Em Sex, 2005-12-02 às 21:16 +0100, Florian Weimer escreveu:
> * Daniel Ruoso:
> > In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian
> > will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing
> > significance made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
> What is the "Debian
* Daniel Ruoso:
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian
> will seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing
> significance made to the Debian Private Mailing List.
What is the "Debian Private Mailing List"?
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or any other alias pointi
As dicussion follows, I decided to formalize a proposal for a real
declassification of the content on -private.
As I said before, if we're going to choose which material is made
public, we can't call it "declassification".
The main points are:
1) Everything except financial information about oth
9 matches
Mail list logo
