On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:27:03PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> Respectfully, dig out the information and present it, or stop claiming
> that these things are going on, you are doing nothing but harming not
> only your own reputation, but that of others of your religion, myself
> included.
s
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:57:15PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> >During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
> >others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
> >evidence of religious disc
#debian-dpl-debate, last night:
01:44 <+TedWalther> JeroenVW:
also, I've started keeping IRC logs, which include your own
prejudiced attitudes.
01:46 <+JeroenVW> TedWalther:
can you prove one quote where I'm discriminating based on religion?
Permission to quote granted hereby
01:47 <+T
"Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
> others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
> evidence of religious discrimination.
>
> After specificly accusing Jeroen van Wolffelaar of this he asked for
> speci
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote:
> I don't have days to spend combing through old logs
> and stripping out little bits and deciding what bits of context to keep
> and which to throw away.
If I recall correctly, you have stated multiple times in the last few
days that yo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:57:15PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
evidence of religious discrimination.
After specificly accusing Jeroen van Wolffelaar of this h
During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
evidence of religious discrimination.
After specificly accusing Jeroen van Wolffelaar of this he asked for
specific examples, granting you permission to pull from h
also sprach Ted Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.01.0303 +0100]:
> Every delegate has free personal choice. If they choose not to
> accept their delegation, then the task will go undone, unless
> someone else steps up to the plate.
On what basis will you select the delegates then? Or do you s
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 02:22:21PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
What sorts of tasks would you plan to delegate? Would you delegate
important decisions, or would you be more interested in delegating
gruntwork?
Until I am DPL, I won't have any idea of the types of things that might
need to be delega
Hi Ted,
Thanks for your answers. Another question regarding delegation:
What sorts of tasks would you plan to delegate? Would you delegate
important decisions, or would you be more interested in delegating
gruntwork?
I ask because the two examples I posted before seems to be of the
gruntwork
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:52:56PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
My question is, how do you distinguish "delegate" from "command" (or its
lesser cousin "request politely")? If you were DPL and you delegated
tasks in this fashion, would you expect them to be done as a matter of
course?
Every delegat
Hi Ted,
I'm a little confused on your interpretation of "delegation". Consider
the following two examples in which you have appointed tasks to others:
1. In a thread from yesterday in which people were seeking out your
opinions, you appear to "delegate" someone else (who had not expressed
eithe
12 matches
Mail list logo
