Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:09:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Well, last year's election was a bit exceptional in that there was > almost nothing to do here on -vote. The previous election I participated > in, OTOH, was one of the most contested elections in Debian's history. I > guess we're b

Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 06:49:51PM +0100, I wrote: > > So, since part of the reason that I joined the race was to make sure it > > wouldn't get too boring, I was hoping there'd be a bit more life on this > > list. Since there isn't, allow me to ask a few questions myself. [Stefano] > FWIW, I disagr

Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-24 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > In my rebuttal, I mention that I lack a sense of vision in your > platform. In case that wasn't clear, this is because the ideas you > mention, while they might work to some extent, seem to be a bit > superficial; I'm afraid they will not s

Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:12:14AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Sure, but to a certain extent that depends on the number of > candidates. If you look back a few more years, you'll see much more. Oh, absolutely, it was not meant to be a blame on last year candidates (also because I was one of the

Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:57:16AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 06:49:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> So, since part of the reason that I joined the race was to make sure it >> wouldn't get too boring, I was hoping there'd be a bit more life on this >> list. Since

Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 06:49:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > So, since part of the reason that I joined the race was to make sure it > wouldn't get too boring, I was hoping there'd be a bit more life on this > list. Since there isn't, allow me to ask a few questions myself. FWIW, I disagree

Re: Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-23 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 06:49:51PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > > Charles: > > In your platform, in the "Program" section, you mention four ideas that > could reasonable be described as being about the things that, > respectively, the DAM and NM frontdesk, the ftp-masters, and the Release >

DPL consultations with the community [was: Re: Question to all (other) candidates]

2010-03-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Wouter-- You probably didn't mean to have this to come out this way, but: On 03/23/2010 01:49 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Charles: > > In your platform, in the "Program" section, you mention four ideas that > could reasonable be described as being about the things that, > respectively, the D

Question to all (other) candidates

2010-03-23 Thread Wouter Verhelst
So, since part of the reason that I joined the race was to make sure it wouldn't get too boring, I was hoping there'd be a bit more life on this list. Since there isn't, allow me to ask a few questions myself. Oh, and before anyone asks: hey, I can vote too, and we have a Condorcet voting system.