The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they
have only made two rulings:
* 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
* 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello DPL candidate,
My question is:
How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
Thanks in advance for your answers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Try "please, blow me away".
In your opinion, is it ever appropriate for any of the
following parties to insist on being "blown away" in exchange
for removing an obstacle to other developers' work? If so, when?
1) DPL
2) ftpmaster
Heyho,
a little question to all those up for the next DPL:
Do you plan on taking on a "2IC" or a team?
If so: Who? And why this/those?
Thanks.
--
bye, Joerg
Well, I’m tired of being a wannabe league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
pgpc4eVogfX8Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Scott James Remnant wrote:
The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they
have only made two rulings:
* 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
* 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum Oh, on rereading I guess I should note explicitly that t
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:41:35PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they
> have only made two rulings:
>
> * 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
> * 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
Note that the LWN article about the DPL election has some quotes from
the candidates about Ubuntu and Debian at:
http://lwn.net/Articles/127031/>
Your question is probably (at leas
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
>
> Note that the LWN article about the DPL election has some quotes from
> the candidates about Ubuntu and Deb
Blu Corater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Problem is, you need to be subscribed to read it.
If you're a Debian Developer, just ask to be added to the group
subscription and you'll get free access (sponsored by HP). If you're
not, you can't vote anyway...
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Franco
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 08:27:04PM -0300, Blu Corater wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
> >
> > Note that the LWN article about t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blu Corater) writes:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
>> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
>>
>> Note that the LWN article about the DPL election has some q
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you believe that the tech-ctte should be relatively inactive? Or do
> you believe that an inactive Technical Committee is a bad thing?
I don't think it would be a bad thing for the technical committee to be
more active, but I don't think that's
Hi,
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007, Holger Levsen wrote:
> DebConf, the annual Debian Developers Conference, is currently not officially
> affiliated with Debian (or SPI) and its not listed on
> http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
>
> Do you think DebConf should have an official endorsement with Deb
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Try "please, blow me away".
>
> In your opinion, is it ever appropriate for any of the
> following parties to insist on being "blown away" in exchange
> for removing a
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I do not know) to decide which set of
architectures in the archive a
Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
>
> I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
> which hat or set of hats, I do not know) to decide which set of
>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:14:05PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
>
> I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
> which hat or set of hat
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
> Now it is unclear which hat AJ is wearing when he implies that he is
> authorized to decide which architectures are important, by criteria he
> decides unilaterally. I am curious as to what the other candidates
> think: is it appropriate for him to do this
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:12:57AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Do you plan on taking on a "2IC" or a team?
I personally don't plan to have neither a DPL board, nor a 2IC.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian
On 03/12/2010 10:55 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I personally don't plan to have neither a DPL board, nor a 2IC.
why not?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:12:57AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Heyho,
>
> a little question to all those up for the next DPL:
>
> Do you plan on taking on a "2IC" or a team?
I don't plan on doing so, no. We've had a few DPLs in the past who did
so, but I don't see a significant difference in p
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >I personally don't plan to have neither a DPL board, nor a 2IC.
> why not?
First of all because I don't think it is needed, then because we lack
evidence that having either a DPL board or a 2IC actually improves the
outcome of a DP
thanks for the detailed answer, good summary of what is also my
impression (that i have about it, as an unqualified observer).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-system
Le Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:12:57AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
> Heyho,
>
> a little question to all those up for the next DPL:
>
> Do you plan on taking on a "2IC" or a team?
> If so: Who? And why this/those?
Hi Joerg,
If I understand correctly, the 2IC is another person that gets the email
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 03:47:53PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> In fact, if you think about it, the proposal of a DPL board / 2IC just
> gives a formal status to something that should be normal,
> i.e. interaction among DPL and people knowledgeable/competent on
> specific topics/tasks.
FWIW
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> a little question to all those up for the next DPL:
> Do you plan on taking on a "2IC" or a team?
> If so: Who? And why this/those?
I don't plan to take a 2IC or a DPL team, in the sense of someone else
receiving lea...@.
I do plan, however
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I do plan, however, to delegate many tasks. Both in the
> constitutional and in the everyday use of the word.
[...]
> So, while not having a particular appointed 2IC, I do plan to ask a
> lot of people for help on the many
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> So, while not having a particular appointed 2IC, I do plan to ask a
>> lot of people for help on the many things I'd like to accomplish. And
>> I also do plan to mention, thank and appreciate all the help received,
>> no matter how smal
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Margarita Manterola
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> What tasks do you have in mind that you plan to delegate?
>
> There are a bunch listed in my yet-to-be-published platform.
I wonder if the questions period of the DPL electi
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Margarita Manterola
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Raphael Geissert
> > wrote:
> >> What tasks do you have in mind that you plan to delegate?
> >
> > There are a bunch listed in my yet-to-be-published platfo
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:55:38PM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
> I wonder if the questions period of the DPL elections would be more
> productive if platforms were published beforehand?
FWIW, my platform is ready, if someone want to have a look before the
official publishing just ask me me, otherwise
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> FWIW, I think a 2IC is much more effective for outside-leaning
> communication, i.e. filtering and/or answering leader@ mail (which
> apparently can be overwhelming) and such, not for communication with
> other project members or team
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:55:38PM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I wonder if the questions period of the DPL elections would be more
> > productive if platforms were published beforehand?
>
> FWIW, my platform is ready, if someone
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> There are a bunch listed in my yet-to-be-published platform. But
> just to give an example from the previous mail, I'd like to have a
> page with rankings of people reporting and fixing bugs, in order to
> give some nice Debian merchandise to the on
Hello =)
Sometimes technical Debian discussions (mailing lists, bug reports,
blog posts, etc.) become personal flame-wars.
Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
acceptable for the Debian project?
What would you do to reduce those?
--Dima.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:25:32AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Since October of 2002, HP has sponsored a subscription to LWN for all
> interested Debian developers, so this shouldn't be an issue for anyone
> eligible to vote in DPL elections.
And thanks for that; it's been a great benefit to De
to all candidates:
If elected, will you ask our Data Protection team and our GDPR lawyer to
jointly do a review of all handling of personal data in Debian regarding
GDPR compliance, and make the results of the review available to all
developers?
Thanks
Adrian
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian
Many people consider the aggressive, often unconstructive atmosphere on
major Debian mailing lists to be a problem. You only need to make a
little spark and suddenly you have ignited a huge thread, up to several
hundred mails per day, a number of which are personal attacks. Even if
they aren't, peo
Hi there,
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
signatu
Hello,
this is a question to all DPL candidates.
Imagine a DD contacts you, she wants to setup an infrastructure to finance
Debian related projects (i.e. paying people to enable them to work on the
projects that they'd like to do for Debian) but she wants to avoid the
main mistakes made during Du
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
> acceptable for the Debian project?
Even though the mailing lists climate is much better than what it was
5 years ago, I think that it still sometimes gets too aggressive,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:40:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
> acceptable for the Debian project? What would you do to reduce those?
Acceptable? No. Normal? To some extent, yes.
Debian has a history of inflammable mailing lis
Le Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:40:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
> Hello =)
Hello again :)
> Sometimes technical Debian discussions (mailing lists, bug reports,
> blog posts, etc.) become personal flame-wars.
>
> Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
> acceptable for
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:40:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Hello =)
>
> Sometimes technical Debian discussions (mailing lists, bug reports,
> blog posts, etc.) become personal flame-wars.
Indeed.
> Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
> acceptable for the Debia
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:40:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> > Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
> > acceptable for the Debian project?
>
> I believe no amount of ad-hominem discussion is acceptable.
There's a significant difference b
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:11:39PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 02:40:32AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> > > Do you think current frequency/amount of heated discussions is
> > > acceptable for the Debian project?
> >
> > I believe no amount o
Dear candidates,
this is the echo of a question asked two years ago in the 2010 campaign.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2010/03/msg00057.html
In addition, do you see major changes happening in the recent or next years,
and how do you think Debian should react to them ?
Have a nice day,
Hi,
this email has two parts:
A short question where I would appreciate a "yes" or "no" answer from
all candidates, and a longer explanation what and why I am asking.
Question:
If elected, will you commit to have a lawyer specialized in that area
review policies and practices around handling o
Hi Candidates,
I'm excited that you all are running and appreciate your willingness to
take on this responsibility.
In November 2021, it was discussed in debian-private that a team from
Debian had been working with a lawyer for a while. (Not sharing
details: issues remain ongoing.) How would you
Hi,
As someone who used to care a lot about Debian, but who hasn't been able
to pay much attention to the project lately, I was wondering:
How is Debian doing currently?
What are the recent successes I might have missed?
Where did we fail or under-perform?
Which big challenges do you see ahead
uirements at least in the EU.
>
> Even the exact scope of the problem is not clear.
>
> Question to all candidates:
>
> If elected, will you ask our Data Protection team and our GDPR lawyer to
> jointly do a review of all handling of personal data in Debian regarding
> GD
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 23:08:41 +0300
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If elected, will you ask our Data Protection team and our GDPR lawyer to
> jointly do a review of all handling of personal data in Debian regarding
> GDPR compliance,
Yes.
> and make the results of the review available to all
> dev
be great if we exceed the expectations of
these legislations around the world.
There seems to be a general agreement that privacy in Debian falls
short of the legal minimum requirements at least in the EU.
Even the exact scope of the problem is not clear.
Question to all candidates:
If electe
]] Jonathan Carter
> So, I would appreciate it if the data protection team could look into
> all of the issues we know of in Debian, but I'd also like there to be
> a process where people can file issues with the data protection
> team. I'll admit I had to search a bit to find the data-protection
]] Adrian Bunk
> Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with their
> reply having been proof-read by our GDPR lawyer?
I don't think th
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:02:15PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Hi Adrian
Hi Jonathan,
>...
> I'm not sure bringing in the lawyer as a first step is optimal, they are
> expensive and will probably tell us a lot of things we already know. IMHO
> it's better to do some initial groundwork, compil
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:28:53PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with their
> reply having been pro
]] Adrian Bunk
> Who will fulfill the request within the legal limit of one month if
> a person sends an email to data-protect...@debian.org asking whether
> Debian is a (joint) controller of any data about this person, and
> if yes requests a copy of all data?
To make this easier for services a
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:40:02PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>...
> This isn't the role of the data protection team, though, any more than
> owner@bugs is responsible for fixing all the bugs in all the packages.
> I'm quite happy to act as a redirector (as per the first part of the
> delegation
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>
> > Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> > Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> > all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with
On 2022/04/01 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1] so far, and with their
reply having been proof-read by our GDPR lawyer?
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:18:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>
> > Who will fulfill the request within the legal limit of one month if
> > a person sends an email to data-protect...@debian.org asking whether
> > Debian is a (joint) controller of any data about this person, an
> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
Adrian> Your "services" approach does not work for the non-trivial
Adrian> cases where Debian might be a (joint) controller of personal
Adrian> data.
Adrian> The Debian Community Team promises confidentiality regarding
Adrian> personal inf
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:16:55 +0300
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> One option would be to outsource this work to our paid GDPR lawyer.
Is there any option to cooperate with other FLOSS organizations?
They would have the same issue and we may be able to share it and
costs ;)
--
Hideki Yamane
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 04:57:38PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk writes:
> Adrian> Your "services" approach does not work for the non-trivial
> Adrian> cases where Debian might be a (joint) controller of personal
> Adrian> data.
>
> Adrian> The Debian C
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:25:46PM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote:
> On 2022/04/01 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Would you commit to something more specific, like that our Data
> > Protection team will reply to debian-project within 3 months discussing
> > all issues mentioned in the discussion at [1
On 2022-04-02 10:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Where does our Privacy Policy[1] describe personal data where Debian and
> the community team are joint controllers?
> Where does our Privacy Policy describe personal data where Debian and
> DAM are joint controllers?
Has it been established yet that Deb
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 23:48 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Will this handwritten note be available through
> contributors.debian.org?
>
> If the personal information in the handwritten note did not come
> directly from the person, who at Debian is responsible to ensure that
> the person
On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2022-04-02 10:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Where does our Privacy Policy[1] describe personal data where Debian and
> > the community team are joint controllers?
>
> > Where does our Privacy Policy describe personal data where
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think of a code of conduct? What in your opinion would be a
> lower limit on acceptable behavior? Do you think that strict rules would
> be better than general guidelines? Who should be the judge if a
> particular case follows the code of con
Heya,
Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
regular basis, they normally are not released "roughly two months after
the last update" (which is the official plan).
Do you know why this doesn't wor
Heya,
Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
long, is asking for too broad knowledge)?
Do you think that we need to change the NM ch
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> A code of conduct has often been mentioned as a possible solution to
> various communication problems we have. The code would have to specify,
> either explicitly or implicitly, some rules for acceptable behavior.
>
> What do you t
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:39:08PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:08:15PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> > And, do you think this code of conduct should be enforced? How?
>
> We already have a code of conduct for the lists that's not enforced;
> it says you can't swear, an
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Secondly, I believe the "personality problems" thing is about a quote of
> mine on -private[1]
Actually it wasn't really a quote at all; if anyone cared I was going
to point at Ted/Jonathan's platform with remarks like "Most of us
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Secondly, I believe the "personality problems" thing is about a quote of
> > mine on -private[1]
>
> Actually it wasn't really a quote at all; if anyone cared I wa
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
>What do you think of a code of conduct? What in your opinion would be a
>lower limit on acceptable behavior? Do you think that strict rules would
>be better than general guidelines? Who should be the judge if a
>particular case foll
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Many people consider the aggressive, often unconstructive atmosphere on
> major Debian mailing lists to be a problem. You only need to make a
> little spark and suddenly you have ignited a huge thread, up to several
> hundred mails p
* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-03 22:20:59]:
> A code of conduct has often been mentioned as a possible solution to
> various communication problems we have. The code would have to specify,
> either explicitly or implicitly, some rules for acceptable behavior.
>
> What do you think
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> What do you think of a code of conduct? What in your opinion would be a
> lower limit on acceptable behavior? Do you think that strict rules would
> be better than general guidelines? Who should be the judge if a
> particular case fo
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point, I am not in favour of such code. I am in favour of giving
> general guidelines and but not to enforce them. People should follow
> them because they agree with them but not because they are forced to.
> Not the least, that provides a real
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (As a reference point, I am no longer on any significant Debian mailing
> lists other than -vote because I am sick of people who behave in an
> anti-social manner towards each other. Allowing people to behave as they
> wish to has a direct cost to the project
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
> Debian to change, what would it be?
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
If I can only pick the things
Anthony Towns writes:
> If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
> for everyone involved.
Yeah, I'm with you!
Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it from
being 100% fun, and what the DPL can do to help them?
I'm interested here both in ans
Anthony Towns writes:
> If I can only pick the things that're directly achievable, I'll just
> go with getting the momentum back -- ie, doing cool things quickly and
> regularly, no matter what they are.
What are some of the organizational or institutional factors which you
think keep us from do
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:09:55PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
> > for everyone involved.
> Yeah, I'm with you!
> Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it from
> being 10
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:18:39AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At this point, I am not in favour of such code. I am in favour of giving
> > general guidelines and but not to enforce them. People should follow
> > them because they agree with the
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
>Debian to change, what would it be?
I'd love to make Debian a more friendly place for everyone.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
> Debian to change, what would it be?
Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussions.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
>> Debian to change, what would it be?
>
> Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussio
* Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-11 13:20:19]:
> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
> Debian to change, what would it be?
It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
could perform a Debian-miracle I would
"make Debian predictabl
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
> could perform a Debian-miracle I would
>
> "make Debian predictable, purpose driven and a fun and rewarding
> context to work and spend time in."
It's clear that this requires good comm
* Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-18 22:29:34]:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
> > could perform a Debian-miracle I would
> >
> > "make Debian predictable, purpose driven and a fun and rewarding
> >
Hi,
this question goes to all candidates:
The Debian Project receives quite a number of monetary donations as well
as contributions in kind via several umbrella organization like SPI,
ffis, debian.ch, etc.
a) What do you think are valid goals to spend this money on?
b) How would you think is a
Le Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:18:00AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> Imagine a DD contacts you, she wants to setup an infrastructure to finance
> Debian related projects (i.e. paying people to enable them to work on the
> projects that they'd like to do for Debian) but she wants to avoid the
>
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:18:00AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> What I like in your proposal is that the projects will need a donor, as
> opposed
> to directly use Debian money. I think that showing the capacity of finding a
> donor is an important filter before enga
Le Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:46:23AM +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>
> If the money is used to pay people and the donor is paying for a
> specific project where it can know who will get paid, this could be seen
> as a work relationship and open a whole other can of worms than we have
> dealt with befor
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Imagine a DD contacts you, she wants to setup an infrastructure to finance
> Debian related projects (i.e. paying people to enable them to work on the
> projects that they'd like to do for Debian) but she wants to avoid the
> main mistakes
Hi,
thanks for your answers!
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Imagine a DD contacts you, she wants to setup an infrastructure to finance
> > Debian related projects (i.e. paying people to enable them to work on the
> >
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:18:00AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Imagine a DD contacts you, she wants to setup an infrastructure to finance
> Debian related projects (i.e. paying people to enable them to work on the
> projects that they'd like to do for Debian) but she wants to avoid the
> main m
1 - 100 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
