Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread Ted Walther
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: (all other candidates feel free to answer the questions as well.) 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile? I just looked it up today. I like the concept a lot. 2.) Do you think this

Re: Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ted Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.12.2209 +0100]: Who is on the current volatile team? They will definitely need to be Debian Developers. How do you intend to work with all those hundreds of active contributors who aren't yet DDs? Will you ignore them? -- Please do not send

Re: Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/2006 06:09 PM, Ted Walther wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: (all other candidates feel free to answer the questions as well.) 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of

Re: Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread Ted Walther
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:23:37PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: They will definitely need to be Debian Developers. With that in mind, you have just kicked me off the Volatile Team. :-) Non-DD contributors are important to Debian, and they deserve greater

Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile

2006-03-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile? [...] Please see the bottom of [1] for my opinion. --Jeroen [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00211.html -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar

Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile

2006-03-08 Thread Ari Pollak
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile? ... more questions about volatile ... Wasn't this just asked by Joey? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile

2006-03-08 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said: Hi Ari, On Wednesday, 08 Mar 2006, you wrote: Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile? ... more questions about volatile ... Wasn't this just asked by Joey? yes, in

Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile

2006-03-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: 2.) Do you think this services should be made an official service of the debian project? Please give a reason for your answer. I like to think of debian.net as an area where we experiment for things that might or might not