Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-10 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:19:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mmm, i think it is important to mention the fact that they are hexdumps, > > since > > all of them are, no ? > > If all of them are, then mention it if you like, but why is it important > what fo

Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-07 Thread MJ Ray
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mmm, i think it is important to mention the fact that they are hexdumps, since > all of them are, no ? If all of them are, then mention it if you like, but why is it important what form the binaries are in? > Why should we delete those. Since in these age

Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-06 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 09:21:21PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 06 October 2006 14:42, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061006 10:00]: > > > I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian > > > kernel team [1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with

Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 06 October 2006 14:42, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061006 10:00]: > > I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian > > kernel team [1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with direct input from > > Manoj, and reflecting assorted comments from

Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-06 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:40:47PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > == START OF PROPOSAL == > > Definition: For the purpose of this resolution, the "firmware" mentioned > > below > > design binary data encoded as hex

Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061006 10:00]: > I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian kernel team > [1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with direct input from Manoj, and > reflecting > assorted comments from others, Steve and Anthony being the most prominent > ones

Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-06 Thread MJ Ray
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > == START OF PROPOSAL == > Definition: For the purpose of this resolution, the "firmware" mentioned below > design binary data encoded as hexdumps in some of the linux kernel drivers and s/design/&ates/ ; s/en

RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion.

2006-10-06 Thread Sven Luther
Hello, I paste here the last instance of the draft proposal by the debian kernel team [1]. Well, mostly me and Frederik, with direct input from Manoj, and reflecting assorted comments from others, Steve and Anthony being the most prominent ones. Please review this, especially with regard to engl