On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> But I think that it is important for any DPL candidate to be able to
> be a conflict solver, and - as the recent dpkg case has shown -
> conflicts over commits do happen, and can get quite bad.
In both cases I have made proposals to go forward but the ot
On Mon, March 10, 2008 11:07, Mike Bird wrote:
> Where is the dpkg team policy that requires Ian to rebase?
> We have asked many times
Exactly who is "we" here? Please name me three of your most recent
contributions to Debian that justify you making demands on the project
c.q. Raphaël.
thanks,
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 10:51]:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 09:46]:
> > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080309 22:05]:
> > > > > #436093 for those followi
On Mon March 10 2008 02:50:51 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> In Ian's case, he was aware before the commit that we didn't want him to
> do the merge and despite the guidance that I tried to provide him, he
> stubbornly was blocked to the unconditional merge of his branch as is
> (that is with a messed up
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 09:46]:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080309 22:05]:
> > > > #436093 for those following along at home.
> > >
> > > It could be dpkg as well.
> >
>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 09:46]:
> > Hi Andreas,
> >
> > On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> > > his opinion under which circumstances he considers i
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 09:46]:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080309 22:05]:
> > > #436093 for those following along at home.
> >
> > It could be dpkg as well.
>
> Can you justify this assertion?
>
> I have worked _wit
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 09:46]:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> > his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit into
> > revision control repositories
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080309 22:05]:
> > #436093 for those following along at home.
>
> It could be dpkg as well.
Can you justify this assertion?
I have worked _with_ Guillem Jover and Frank Lichtenheld and _they_ have
granted me commit
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit into
> revision control repositories of a team where the person leading the
> team is active and asks t
* MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080310 08:13]:
> Oh and I don't really understand the question: why should anyone stop
> commits into a repository? You could just ask that they're not put on
> the release management branch without review.
I'm speaking of the release management branch, like it e.g.
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080309 22:05]:
> * Andreas Barth [Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:28:52 +0100]:
>
> > as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> > his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit into
> > revision control repositories of a te
aj wrote: [...]
> ...so much for non-adversarial campaigning, I guess.
Why? So far, this is only adversarial questioning of a candidate.
It doesn't necessarily require adversarial campaigning in reply.
Or is aba campaigning for one of the other candidates?
FWIW, I think each of the candidates ha
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 09:28:52PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit into
> revision control repositories of a team where the person leading the
> team is active an
* Andreas Barth [Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:28:52 +0100]:
> as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit into
> revision control repositories of a team where the person leading the
> team is active and asks to n
On 09/03/2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
> his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit
> into revision control repositories of a team where the person leading
> the team is active and asks to not commit.
Hi,
Hi,
as campaigning has started, I would like to know from Raphael Hertzog
his opinion under which circumstances he considers it ok to commit into
revision control repositories of a team where the person leading the
team is active and asks to not commit.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/an
17 matches
Mail list logo