MJ Ray wrote:
I may do that later, so for future: Does [EMAIL PROTECTED] have an archive?
Yes, it's on master:/home/debian/archive/debian-dwn and readable
by the Debian (800) group.
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law
--
To
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:21:05PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oooh! So the fact that I've shown up in it a few times means I'm part of
the Cabal now?
No, not by a large margin. I have a cabalometric experiment at
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe. Call it revenge if you want, but please consider whether
there's truth behind them or how one can tell.
Your accusations are, as far as I can tell, entirely false.
Can you tell? I know at least one is
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The list shows everybody who has more than 1000 points. You are not
among them (except if my DWN-parsing script is broken), but MJ himself
currently has 2661 points and a ranking of #30.
Interesting, but missing any measure of whether I'm being
kissed
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:28:43PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The list shows everybody who has more than 1000 points. You are not
among them (except if my DWN-parsing script is broken), but MJ himself
currently has 2661 points and a ranking of #30.
Scripsit MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting, but missing any measure of whether I'm being
kissed or kicked.
If we are talking about the same publication, then neither. For all
the time I have read DWN, its stories have consisted of neutral
references to threads on the mailing lists, with no
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe. Call it revenge if you want, but please consider whether
there's truth behind them or how one can tell.
Your accusations are, as far as I can tell, entirely false.
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting, but missing any measure of whether I'm being
kissed or kicked.
If we are talking about the same publication, then neither. For all
the time I have read DWN, its stories have consisted of neutral
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you cannot substantiate them publicly, then they are nothing more
than pissing in the wind.
Get Message-Id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it matters that much to you. I
don't have a copy here and I've not checked my
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But one example *cannot* demonstrate your point. [...]
I was referring to DWN being one example of communication in debian.
Nor, for that matter, does a Message-ID prove anything. You can't say
or remember what's in that message, can you?
Yes,
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it's the message about my first point, where Martin Schulze
told me that in-project communication was never a goal of DWN.
This exchange illustrates my fifth point: you do not know how
DWN actually works and I don't think you can find out reliably.
I
Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scripsit MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Neither feels that the groups it reports on are their main
audience.
As far as I can see, the main audience of DWN is Debian developers,
package maintainers, and other members of the community. This audience
is
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:26:20AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
* They have friends who get puffed regularly, but good news
stories about groups on the blacklist can get ignored and/or
stuffed at the bottom of the issue.
Oooh! So the fact that I've shown up in it a few times means I'm part of
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, if someone thinks something should be in DWN, sending a mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] really helps.
It helps to get a reply a month later with inaccurate inflated rewrites.
At least it helped for me everytime I wanted to have something covered.
14 matches
Mail list logo
