Re: Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-23 Thread Bdale Garbee
Some of the links have changed because of our change to using user 'secretary' for the vote processing. You can see the list of currently tallied votes, for example, at: http://master.debian.org/~secretary/gr_lenny/voters.txt Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists

Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-23 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Debian Project Secretary [081222 23:39]: > However, after thinking long and hard about this, I can find no real > constitutional basis for terminating the current vote. Therefore, attached > you will find the second call for votes. The only substantive change is that > I corrected the date and

Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-23 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Frans Pop said: > On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > But note that even if the super-majority issue causes some choices to > > have a low priority of winning, we the project at large can still learn > > very interesting things by studying the Condorcet

Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-22 Thread Frans Pop
(Restricting to d-vote.) Thank you for your quick reply. On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Bdale Garbee wrote: > But note that even if the super-majority issue causes some choices to > have a low priority of winning, we the project at large can still learn > very interesting things by studying the Co

Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-22 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 00:56 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: Hi Frans! > That is not the only problem. I agree, but I didn't think a CFV preamble was the right place to try and discuss this in detail. Happy to have further discussion about it in debian-vote. > > However, after thinking long and hard a

Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-22 Thread Frans Pop
Hello Bdale, Thanks a lot for this mail. I had been planning to write a mail asking for a standpoint on the vote, but I'm glad I waited long enough for this to arrive first. On Monday 22 December 2008, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > It is clear that there are flaws with the way the current b

Re: Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-22 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:39:33PM -0700, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > >- - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >41b0a520-c6c1-4e7b-8c49-74ee85faf242 >[ 6 ] Choice 1: Reaffirm the Social Contract >[ 5 ] Choice 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firm

Second call for votes for the Lenny release GR

2008-12-22 Thread Debian Project Secretary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 With the resignation of our project Secretary, under section 7.2 of the Debian Constitution, as Chairman of the Debian Technical Committee, I now serve as the Acting Secretary. Thank you to those of you who have shown your support over the past few