Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-12-06 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:57:52 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I was planning to resurrect it from CVS once sarge is released. Well, I have created a verion 1.1 document, while leaving the social contract default link be the same as the 1.0 document, so we have access to the

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-12-01 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:15:20PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:02:07 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert > >> the social c

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-12-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 00:28:52 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:59:49AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: >> aj or Matt, do you know if there are other location where the >> social contract is out of date ? > I don't know of any other out-of-date copies, but I di

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-12-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:02:07 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert >> the social contract back to the original version. Is that going to >> actually happen at

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-12-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:02:07 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert >> the social contract back to the original version. Is that going to >> actually happen at

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-12-01 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:02:07 -0800, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: >> It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert >> the social contract back to the original version. Is that going to >> actually happen at

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-11-30 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:59:49AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: > aj or Matt, do you know if there are other location where the social > contract is out of date ? I don't know of any other out-of-date copies, but I didn't know that the web site copy was out-of-date until I read AJ's e-mail. -- M

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-11-30 Thread Pierre Machard
Hello, On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:02:07AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert the > > social contract back to the original version. Is that going to actually > > happen at s

Re: Social Contract reversion

2004-11-26 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:29:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert the > social contract back to the original version. Is that going to actually > happen at some point? > > ] $ lynx -dump http://www.debian.org/social_contract | grep

Social Contract reversion

2004-11-24 Thread Anthony Towns
Hi, It's been almost five months since the project decided to revert the social contract back to the original version. Is that going to actually happen at some point? ] $ lynx -dump http://www.debian.org/social_contract | grep Debian.will ] 1. Debian will remain 100% free Cheers, aj signat