Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 02 octobre 2006 à 12:10 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > A reasonable person might not like what the DPL did,. and > might not want to support him, but might not consider it warranting a > recall. > > So, a person might want to a) not recall, not affirm, > b) not r

Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-10-02 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:22:51 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> As I currently understand it, the position statement GR regarding >> the project leader and Dunc-Tank has adequate numbers of seconds; >> and recei

Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-09-27 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:07:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > As I currently understand it, the position statement GR > regarding the project leader and Dunc-Tank has adequate numbers of > seconds; and received enough seconds on the 21st of September. > > This is a

Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-09-24 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le lun 25 septembre 2006 01:40, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > Following informal opposition during internal discussions, Anthony > Towns and al, have started soliciting donations for this purpose, in > an initiative called `dunc-tank'. s/and al/et al./ -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O

Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-09-24 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.24.2207 +0200]: > J) > From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:56:38 +0200 > > Signature made by expired key 220BC883330C4A75 Martin F. Krafft > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My key

Re: State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-09-24 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le dim 24 septembre 2006 22:07, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > Hi, > > As I currently understand it, the position statement GR > regarding the project leader and Dunc-Tank has adequate numbers of > seconds; and received enough seconds on the 21st of September. > > This is an indepen

State of the GR's: Part 2 - Position statement on the DPL and Dunc-Tank

2006-09-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, As I currently understand it, the position statement GR regarding the project leader and Dunc-Tank has adequate numbers of seconds; and received enough seconds on the 21st of September. This is an independent proposal. The attached file shows my current understandin