Re: Suggest ballot-by-section of the FDL position GR

2006-01-27 Thread Fabian Fagerholm
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 12:22 +, MJ Ray wrote: > No. I'll thank you to get better at spotting jokes. I expect there are > others who agree with aj's text on some points and adeodato's on another. > I'd like to have a way to resolve that conflict without it being a choice > between voting for text

Re: Suggest ballot-by-section of the FDL position GR

2006-01-26 Thread MJ Ray
Michael wrote: > > I'm thinking of something like > > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/gr-fdl.txt (24k, only based on originals) > > Uhm, this is a joke, right? No. I'll thank you to get better at spotting jokes. I expect there are others who agree with aj's text on some points and adeodato's on ano

Re: Suggest ballot-by-section of the FDL position GR

2006-01-25 Thread Michael Banck
> I'm thinking of something like > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/gr-fdl.txt (24k, only based on originals) Uhm, this is a joke, right? Michael -- ban me ban me ban me 20:58 -!- apprentice has quit [Excess Flood] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Suggest ballot-by-section of the FDL position GR

2006-01-25 Thread MJ Ray
There seems to be a lot of views on each aspect of the proposed statement and I think any more options will overlap with others, but might still not allow some valid combinations to be voiced. Is it possible to ballot the FDL position GR and its amendments "by section" to try to find a compromise