Re: Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread Ted Walther
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:23:37PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote: They will definitely need to be Debian Developers. With that in mind, you have just "kicked me off" the Volatile Team. :-) Non-DD contributors are important to Debian, and they deserve greater

Re: Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/2006 06:09 PM, Ted Walther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> (all other candidates feel free to answer the questions as well.) >> 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of >> debian-

Re: Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ted Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.12.2209 +0100]: > Who is on the current volatile team? They will definitely need to > be Debian Developers. How do you intend to work with all those hundreds of active contributors who aren't yet DDs? Will you ignore them? -- Please do not se

Ted replies to Martin (Re: Questions to candidates Towns and van Wolffelaar: debian-volatile)

2006-03-12 Thread Ted Walther
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: (all other candidates feel free to answer the questions as well.) 1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile? I just looked it up today. I like the concept a lot. 2.) Do you think this services