On 2013-03-23 19:16, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/03/13 at 12:46 +0300, Moray Allan wrote:
Yes. But I would suggest that we should aim to build a really good
contributor-tracking system
Or improve the existing ones, such as the 'echelon' field in ldap (=
last mailing list post), the mia db, ba
On 23/03/13 at 12:46 +0300, Moray Allan wrote:
> On 2013-03-23 05:54, Paul Wise wrote:
> >There are definitely people in that position (I can think of at least
> >one), it would be interesting to quantify how many Debian members
> >make
> >no visible contributions, if for no other reason than makin
On 2013-03-22 23:23, Moray Allan wrote:
As other replies have said, this seems to be much less of a solved
problem in recent years
Since someone asked: yes, this is an accidental blend from editing
"seems to be a solved problem" insufficiently towards "seems to be much
less of a problem". I'
On 2013-03-23 05:54, Paul Wise wrote:
There are definitely people in that position (I can think of at least
one), it would be interesting to quantify how many Debian members
make
no visible contributions, if for no other reason than making their
contributions (if any) visible.
Yes. But I wou
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Moray Allan wrote:
> retire gracefully. It's still possible for someone to continue as a project
> member indefinitely if they want to, without doing any work, if they get rid
> of all their responsibilities first, but I don't think that a large enough
> number of
Le Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:15:32AM +0100, Gergely Nagy a écrit :
>
> Do you see a particular problem, or shortcoming, perhaps, that you'd
> like to see solved?
Hi all,
the problem I was trying to solve was to find more differences between the
candidates :) For instance, one of you might have an
On 2013-03-20 05:22, Charles Plessy wrote:
In Debian, we stay member until we die or quit (or very
exceptionally, are
expelled). The consequence is that it is hard to evaluate how much
active
members we have. It may also create more crispations about giving
membership.
As other replies have
Charles Plessy writes:
> In Debian, we stay member until we die or quit (or very exceptionally, are
> expelled). The consequence is that it is hard to evaluate how much active
> members we have. It may also create more crispations about giving membership.
>
> We often discussed about how to bec
On 20/03/13 at 11:22 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did not manage to formulate a better subject... the question is about what
> should be the usual way to end our formal membership in the Debian project.
>
> In Debian, we stay member until we die or quit (or very exceptionally, are
> e
Charles Plessy (20/03/2013):
> In Debian, we stay member until we die or quit (or very exceptionally, are
> expelled). […]
Or spotted as being MIA. This might help:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I did not manage to formulate a better subject... the question is about what
should be the usual way to end our formal membership in the Debian project.
In Debian, we stay member until we die or quit (or very exceptionally, are
expelled). The consequence is that it is hard to evaluate how mu
11 matches
Mail list logo
