On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 04:04:22PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> You're also making some implicit assumptions about what is available -
> are there really 9855 new projects that should have been added to Debian
> last year that weren't?
Via twitter [0] here's another point of comparison: the iPho
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 04:04:22PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I wouldn't say that's particularly quickly; but given the varying release
> > times, it's a bit hard to really tell. Correcting for that:
> > release datedays s.p.d p.p.d sg.p.a pg.p.a
> > hamm 1998-07-24
> >
This one time, at band camp, Anthony Towns said:
>
> I wouldn't say that's particularly quickly; but given the varying release
> times, it's a bit hard to really tell. Correcting for that:
>
> release datedays s.p.d p.p.d sg.p.a pg.p.a
> hamm 1998-07-24
> slink199
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:23:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:59:43PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>] Campaigning period: Sunday, March 8th 00:00:00 UTC, 2009
>]- Saturday, March 28th 23:59:59 UTC, 2009
>
>Hmmm... Cutting it fine...
Yup. :-)
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:59:43PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
] Campaigning period: Sunday, March 8th 00:00:00 UTC, 2009
]- Saturday, March 28th 23:59:59 UTC, 2009
Hmmm... Cutting it fine...
> Depending on what you're measuring, we are still growing very quickly.
> Th
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:05:07AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
>One of the most impressive things about Debian in the past was its
>exponential growth -- users, developers, packages, architectures,
>email volume, etc -- but I wonder if that's still happening, or if
>growth is something that's bee
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:49:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Over the next twelve months, what single development/activity/project
> > is going to improve Debian's value the most? By how much? How will
> > you be involved?
> Maybe you meant to ask "what are
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:05:07AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> So looking through the nominations, platforms and the current -vote
> threads, I'm left wondering if any of this actually matters. Only
> two candidates running, no IRC debate or rebuttals added to the
> platforms,
[ Don't worry, you
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Over the next twelve months, what single development/activity/project
> is going to improve Debian's value the most? By how much? How will
> you be involved?
Having such a discussion is really interesting, I would not limit it
to -vote and DP
I should probably note here that it looked like Anthony had carefully
phrased his question to apply to the entire project, not just the DPL
candidates, and I replied in that context. If it was intended as a DPL
candidate question, er, never mind. :)
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
Anthony Towns writes:
> So here's the question, and really the only part of this mail that
> warrants a response:
>
> Over the next twelve months, what single development/activity/project
> is going to improve Debian's value the most? By how much? How will
> you be involved?
Maybe yo
Hi *,
So looking through the nominations, platforms and the current -vote
threads, I'm left wondering if any of this actually matters. Only two
candidates running, no IRC debate or rebuttals added to the platforms,
and only a couple of topics people have even raised for the candidates
to address?
12 matches
Mail list logo
