Re: communication obscurity [was: debian-women obscurity]

2005-03-05 Thread Ben Burton
> > > [...] Can't blame > > > people for not seeing cool stuff if it's stuck away in an > > > obscure backwater mostly unannounced. > > Where was there blame? [...] > > After krooger wondered about adequate transparency, there was > http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/03/msg00032.html Well:

Re: communication obscurity [was: debian-women obscurity]

2005-03-05 Thread MJ Ray
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:25:49AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > > Like those are the only two options, the two extremes. It > When you're trying to solve the problem of "ensure that someone you may not > know exists gets your announcements", that is basically i

Re: communication obscurity [was: debian-women obscurity]

2005-03-04 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:25:49AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can list all the mailing lists and fora you read, but the point is that > > unless you watch the entire world's open communications, you will miss > > announcements. It's a fact of life. Th