Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-21 Thread Ean Schuessler
- "Anthony Towns" wrote: > I consider being able to easily install Debian and get it running on > whatever random hardware I buy an essential freedom, so I see most of > this as people trying to take away my freedoms. Obviously, your mileage > varies, but that doesn't make either of us popul

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-21 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho dijo [Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:51:39PM +0200]: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 01:43:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Politics is the art of making people who disagree with you look stupid > > and immoral. > > Politics is, in my experience, the art of finding the compromise tha

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-20 Thread MJ Ray
Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:54:08AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > I did not mean this to be argumentative. A rhetorical flourish, > > yes. The quote is from a US politicial, and the analogy between the > > constitutions and bill of rights was amusing. > > Uh,

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-20 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 01:43:44PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Politics is the art of making people who disagree with you look stupid > and immoral. Politics is, in my experience, the art of finding the compromise that both you and the people who disagree with you can live with (usually both con

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, Dec 19 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:54:08AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 19 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: >> >> I tend to come down hard on the side of not compromising my >> >> principles for temporary convenience or popularity (or, if you

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:54:08AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> I tend to come down hard on the side of not compromising my > >> principles for temporary convenience or popularity (or, if you will, > >> market share). > >> To para

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:00:59PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote: > "We need some time to solve the problems that are in main" the first > time round I can live with, but uploading new instances of the same > problems to main, I think this is a strawman that doesn't correspond either to what has actual

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > In short, the ongoing GR isn’t about this disagreement, for which a > suitable compromise already exists; it is about imposing more > restrictions on the stable release than on the unstable suite. I do not know about anyone els

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 19 décembre 2008 à 12:36 +0100, Marc Haber a écrit : > This is something we need to agree to disagree on. There are people > who still focus on "The Universal Operating System", and who are > willing to make compromises in freedom without being willing to make a > totally non-free OS.

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, Dec 19 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:12:28AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> Putting an USB key into most of my servers requires some hours of >> driving and jumping through security hoops to get datacenter access. >> [...] >> I'd prefer an OS which allows full remote

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:36:54PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:50:40AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > To paraphrase: Those who give up essential freedoms for > > temporary convenience and popularity deserve neither. > This is something we need to agree

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Didier Raboud
Didier Raboud wrote: > Providing a guaranteed (as much of Debian's knowledge) free Linux kernel > and installer in main would be really fulfilling Debian's promises. This > does not necessarily exclude providing a "contaminated" installer and/or > kernel in contrib (or elsewhere). I just forgot s

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Didier Raboud
Mike O'Connor wrote: > > If we make users have to decide between the "100% free installer" and > the "installer with non-free", and it makes the user have to think about > "what is this non-free stuff, and why should I care". I think it is an > added side benefit. If a user at some point decides

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Mike O'Connor
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 02:44:46PM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > I suspect it would not be hard to create a non-free installer CD > > that obviates the requirement of a separate USB key for remote > > i

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I suspect it would not be hard to create a non-free installer CD > that obviates the requirement of a separate USB key for remote > installs. If (almost?) everyone will use non-free stuff anyway, why not just make l

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:12:28AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Putting an USB key into most of my servers requires some hours of > driving and jumping through security hoops to get datacenter access. > [...] > I'd prefer an OS which allows full remote installation that does not > need some kind of p

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:50:40AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Let us face it: there are always going to be bits of hardware > that can not be supported with free software; users might always have > to deal with either refraining from buying such hardware (which is not > always feas

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-19 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, Dec 19 2008, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:09:55AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> For what it is worth, at work we had to install Lenny on >> machines which have the broadcom netextreme 2 ethernet cards (bnx2 >> firmware needed). The netinst installer worked w

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-18 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:09:55AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > For what it is worth, at work we had to install Lenny on > machines which have the broadcom netextreme 2 ethernet cards (bnx2 > firmware needed). The netinst installer worked wonderfully, grabbing > the firmware from a u

Re: gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-18 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, Dec 18 2008, Anthony Towns wrote: > Hello world, > > I'd like to briefly suggest a different perspective on the issues at hand. > Rather than looking at whether this will delay lenny or not, it might be > more useful to just take a step back and work out what our principles are. > FWIW, I

gr_lenny vs gr_socialcontract

2008-12-18 Thread Anthony Towns
Hello world, I'd like to briefly suggest a different perspective on the issues at hand. Rather than looking at whether this will delay lenny or not, it might be more useful to just take a step back and work out what our principles are. FWIW, I think what should be done about lenny follows pretty o