Hi,
this question goes to all candidates:
The Debian Project receives quite a number of monetary donations as well
as contributions in kind via several umbrella organization like SPI,
ffis, debian.ch, etc.
a) What do you think are valid goals to spend this money on?
b) How would you think
Le Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:02:59AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit :
The Debian Project receives quite a number of monetary donations as well
as contributions in kind via several umbrella organization like SPI,
ffis, debian.ch, etc.
a) What do you think are valid goals to spend this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Margarita Manterola wrote:
I do plan, however, to delegate many tasks. Both in the
constitutional and in the everyday use of the word.
[...]
So, while not having a particular appointed 2IC, I do plan to ask a
lot of people for help on the many
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org wrote:
The Debian Project receives quite a number of monetary donations as well
as contributions in kind via several umbrella organization like SPI,
ffis, debian.ch, etc.
a) What do you think are valid goals to spend this
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Margarita Manterola
margamanter...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org wrote:
What tasks do you have in mind that you plan to delegate?
There are a bunch listed in my yet-to-be-published platform.
I wonder if
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Margarita Manterola
margamanter...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org
wrote:
What tasks do you have in mind that you plan to delegate?
There are a bunch listed
Hello,
this is a question to all DPL candidates.
Imagine a DD contacts you, she wants to setup an infrastructure to finance
Debian related projects (i.e. paying people to enable them to work on the
projects that they'd like to do for Debian) but she wants to avoid the
main mistakes made during
Heyho,
a little question to all those up for the next DPL:
Do you plan on taking on a 2IC or a team?
If so: Who? And why this/those?
Thanks.
--
bye, Joerg
Well, I’m tired of being a wannabe league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
pgpc4eVogfX8Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Le Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:04:59PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
I can also see that you have your own menu/desktop topic there too
that I expect you'll want to raise. What are your plans for that?
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DiscussionsAfterLenny
Hi Steve,
First I plan to produce a
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:47:49PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:04:59PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
I can also see that you have your own menu/desktop topic there too
that I expect you'll want to raise. What are your plans for that?
[1]
Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear Steve, Luk and Stefano,
Hi Charles
thank you very much for the time and efforts you are proposing to dedicate to
the Project !
Our Consitution suggests a stronger leadership of the DPL the discussions:
9. Lead discussions amongst Developers.
The
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:13:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
thank you very much for the time and efforts you are proposing to
dedicate to the Project !
Hi Charles, thanks for your question.
Our Consitution suggests a stronger leadership of the DPL the
discussions:
snip
Given how heated
Charles Plessy wrote:
I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
july.
On 13/03/2008, Paul Wise wrote:
Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
Not sure why you don't know about this, nor where the best place to
store this information is, perhaps the NM templates
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:07:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
Le Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:50:27AM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
Untrue, you just
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:21:23PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
(And since this thread is supposed to be questions for the DPL
candidates, I will add one: some time ago, a DD was sending emails on
-devel whenever the discussion was offtopic, to ask for it to be
transferred or stopped: what do you think of this
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
in a timely manner and fulfil all the requirements? What would your
declassification team look like
Hi Moritz, hi Marc.
I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
july.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(building non-free on official autobuilders is not allowed).
Untrue, you just need to get your package whitelisted since non-free
packages may not be legal to autobuild. You need to contact aba IIRC.
Not sure why you
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:20:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Hi,
Hi Charles,
Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
that it
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:21:23PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
If you were elected DPL for the next term, what would you do about this
GR and when? How would you ensure that the declassification can happen
in a timely manner and fulfil all the
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 04:20:35AM +, Charles Plessy wrote:
Can we imagine a more componentised Debian distribution, in which it
would be the common responsability of the packagers and the service
managers to opt in or opt out the use of each services by Debian
packages (or preferably
Dear candidates,
At the end of 2005, the Debian Project passed a General Resolution [0]
to declassify posts made to the debian-private mailing list. The GR
specified that posts that are at least three years old will be
considered for publishing. It also specified that the DPL will appoint a
team
Charles Plessy wrote:
Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you help
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you help this
process as a DPL.
Debian has steadily grown in the past few years, at least in respect to
the number of
Hi,
Although I am not yet a DD, as it can happen anytime before or after the
elections, I would like to ask a question to the candidates.
Debian is growing bigger everyday. I would like to know if you think
that it should adapt to its new size, and if yes, how can you help this
process as a DPL.
Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, your arbitrary dislike of Google is well-enough known
already; it has no place in this forum.
Apparently it's not well-enough known that it's not arbitrary, but
actually based on their irritating bugs and misbehaviour!
Also, maybe some
MJ Ray wrote:
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
outcome? Which projects where successful and which failed?
I also mentored a I18N related project. The
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
The Google Summer of Code[0] is over, and final reports have been
submitted. Most of our students worked well right up to (and in some
cases beyond) the end of the summer, and hopefully we'll see some
useful results from their
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
that sounds to me like you wanted to continue with but you cant
do that???as they are all volunteers and you cant push them or so.
could you elaborate? were you in the position to push people to
do something in debian, and how did
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
but after that, I didn't find another search result until he mentioned
the 2007 marketing campaign. Is this the sort of fire and forget
reporting that we would expect if Steve McIntyre were elected DPL?
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this? [cc'd to
-vote for these questions, please drop -project or -vote on replies]
This is not really up to the DPL. That would be useless micro-management.
Last year was our first participation and it has
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this? [cc'd to
-vote for these questions, please drop -project or -vote on replies]
This is not really up to the DPL. That would be useless micro-management.
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this? [cc'd to
-vote for these questions, please drop -project or -vote on replies]
This is not really up to the DPL. That would be useless micro-management.
[...]
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
outcome? Which projects where successful and which failed?
Excellent questions!
Steve McIntyre wrote in Bits from
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-03-16 9:22 +]:
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
outcome? Which projects where successful and which
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
So, just to be sure I've understood your reply: if you-as-DPL (or one of
your delegates) tells us that we can expect something, that would't mean
anything if the task depends on someone else? You'd feel that you need
not check whether we get it, or give any
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
Bastian Venthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like Google is really everywhere these days. I'm curious about
SoC: What where the last year's Debian projects and what was there
outcome? Which projects where successful and which failed?
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070316 14:35]:
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this?
The only way you can do that is by actively asking people to produce a
report when they said they'd do so.
that sounds to me like you wanted to continue with but you cant
do
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:22:40AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
[...] Is this the sort of fire and forget
reporting that we would expect if Steve McIntyre were elected DPL?
[...]
If writing the full report wasn't Steve's responsability, then it's not
fair
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070316 14:35]:
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this?
The only way you can do that is by actively asking people to produce a
report when they said they'd do so.
that sounds to me
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070316 14:35]:
How would other candidates avoid dropping topics like this?
The only way you can do that is by actively asking people to produce a
report when they said they'd do so.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Try please, blow me away.
In your opinion, is it ever appropriate for any of the
following parties to insist on being blown away in exchange
for removing an obstacle to other developers' work? If so, when?
1) DPL
2) ftpmaster
3)
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Try please, blow me away.
In your opinion, is it ever appropriate for any of the
following parties to insist on being blown away in exchange
for removing an obstacle
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I do not know) to decide which set of
architectures in the archive
Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I do not know) to decide which set of
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:14:05PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:43:41PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this question, or what the point is.
I will clarify. AJ obviously feels that it is his prerogative (under
which hat or set of hats, I
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
Now it is unclear which hat AJ is wearing when he implies that he is
authorized to decide which architectures are important, by criteria he
decides unilaterally. I am curious as to what the other candidates
think: is it appropriate for him to do this,
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing like a moral right to mock people, just like there is
nothing like a moral right not to be mocked.
Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring women
from
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing like a moral right to mock people, just like there is
nothing like a moral right not to be mocked.
Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring women
from involvement in free software is the perceived hostility of
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing like a moral right to mock people, just like there is
nothing like a moral right not to be mocked.
Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring women
from involvement in free software is
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:41:09PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing like a moral right to mock people, just like there is
nothing like a moral right not to be mocked.
Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring women
from involvement in free software is the perceived hostility of many of
the communities. Do candidates believe that mocking of other members of
the project is acceptable[2],
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:41:09PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring women
from involvement in free software is the perceived hostility of many of
the communities. Do candidates believe that mocking of other members of
the project is
Hi,
this question is for all candidates:
How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
integrate them into official Debian structure?
Martin
[1] http://www.debian-unofficial.org/
http
Hi,
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
integrate them into official Debian structure?
All unofficial archives serve a purpose, but they are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How important are unofficial archives for you? What whould you do to
support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
integrate them into official Debian structure?
If we would follow along the line of my distribution trunk
Hi,
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007, Holger Levsen wrote:
DebConf, the annual Debian Developers Conference, is currently not officially
affiliated with Debian (or SPI) and its not listed on
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
Do you think DebConf should have an official endorsement with Debian
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
hi Martin,
this question is for all candidates:
How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
integrate them into official Debian
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
this question is for all candidates:
How important are unofficial archives[1] for you?
They are important, as they allow people to do stuff with their Debian
installation that isn't necessarily possible with Debian
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
How important are unofficial archives[1] for you? What whould you do to
support them, if you consider them important? What could be done to
integrate them into official Debian structure?
As a general rule, I find unofficial archives
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve McIntyre wrote:
That's an awkward question to answer, and I've been involved in
debates on it several times already over the last couple of years. We
need to work this out as a project; this may take quite some time
yet...
I've seen this come
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussions.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussions.
* Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-11 13:20:19]:
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
could perform a Debian-miracle I would
make Debian predictable,
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
could perform a Debian-miracle I would
make Debian predictable, purpose driven and a fun and rewarding
context to work and spend time in.
It's clear that this requires good
* Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-18 22:29:34]:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
could perform a Debian-miracle I would
make Debian predictable, purpose driven and a fun and rewarding
context to work
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:18:39AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, I am not in favour of such code. I am in favour of giving
general guidelines and but not to enforce them. People should follow
them because they agree with them but not
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi there,
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
I'd love to make Debian a more friendly place for everyone.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:20:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Such requests and requirements change the situation. However, I have
to admit that I first read about this particular requirement here. I
noticed some babbling about ppc64, sparc64, mips64 and s390x
architectures but nothing
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Why would we need more total CPU time? Not even leisner is
overloaded at the moment, and it's probably the slowliest machine.
(leisner has a different problem, though).
Hence, please explain why we need more total CPU time and
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Why would we need more total CPU time? Not even leisner is
overloaded at the moment, and it's probably the slowliest machine.
(leisner has a different problem, though).
Hence, please explain why we
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:20:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Such requests and requirements change the situation. However, I have
to admit that I first read about this particular requirement here. I
noticed some babbling about ppc64, sparc64, mips64 and s390x
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:09:55PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
Yeah, I'm with you!
Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
There is no way at the moment to see any progress of the issues in public.
Now my question:
1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
openly?
2.) Would you encourage debian-admin to do so? If
[redirecting to -devel where this belongs]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
--
Question to the release and archive people: Is there such a
requirement? Will such architectures indeed be
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:14:21AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Uh, what the hell?
You have four people asking basically the same question, and you
wonder about this?
Yes, because _all_ of them leap to the conclusion that I'm trying to delay
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:20:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Are bruckner and voltaire overloaded or do they lack services the
developers
need?
The release team has called for a multi-arch implementation to support
powerpc64 userland over the biarch situation. This calls for a
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
the past, there were some issues that seem to indicate that the current
Debian System Administrator team (DSA team) is overworked, as problems
were not adressed in a timely fashion. The following just lists some of
these
also sprach Ted Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.12.2220 +0100]:
That is a tough question to answer. So far they have been getting
the job done, but appear to be getting overworked lately.
Please define lately?
For the good of the project, we need some way to let the sysadmin
team do
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
There are a few reasons to dislike the DPL team concept without going
it alone; such as the liklihood of formal membership making it difficult
for non-members to contribute in the same way members do, or the way that
making the team be an issue at
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Now my question:
1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
openly?
2.) Would you
Bill Allombert wrote:
Example of non-priviledged services include secondary web services and
developers accessible port machines with separate accounts. As an
aside, I think there should be more developers-accessible port machines.
Why?
Having two developers-accessible port
Hi there,
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
* Raphael Hertzog [Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100]:
(even if I don't think that stockholm would do the best DPL).
Is this a statement, or an hypothesis? If a statement, then I feel
compelled to ask: who would?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:39:20PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Last November, [Andreas] and the DPL team wanted to propose a GR that
would have forcibly made everyone in a position of authority a formal
delegate, and stated that you had replacements ready if they were
unwilling to comply.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:05:06AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-10 23:23:52]:
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not ask Joeren for obvious reasons.
What were those obvious reasons? You and Branden stood against each
other
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog [Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:06:01 +0100]:
(even if I don't think that stockholm would do the best DPL).
Is this a statement, or an hypothesis? If a statement, then I feel
compelled to ask: who would?
It's a statement that I will
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:26:47PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
At that time I emphazised several times that replacing the teams
was only the very last, desperate option, which we were trying to
avoid but for completeness sake had considered along with a
variety of less drastical
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
Debian to change, what would it be?
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
If I can only pick the things
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
for everyone involved.
Yeah, I'm with you!
Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it from
being 100% fun, and what the DPL can do to help them?
I'm
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
If I can only pick the things that're directly achievable, I'll just
go with getting the momentum back -- ie, doing cool things quickly and
regularly, no matter what they are.
What are some of the organizational or institutional factors which you
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:03:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Are bruckner and voltaire overloaded or do they lack services the developers
need?
The release team has called for a multi-arch implementation to support
powerpc64 userland over the biarch situation. This calls for a machine
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-09 20:39:20]:
1) You now appear less willing to do so. What has changed?
The GR was intendet to clarify that point.
However, in a small oppinion poll I found that this apparently
was already clear to
Hi,
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060310 14:42]:
[...]
You reiterate things where Andreas clearly stated that you have
over-interpreted him.
What is the purpose of this? Do you have some personal issues with
Andreas Schuldei? Are you too unhappy that you didn't suceed in last
years
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060310 14:42]:
[...]
You reiterate things where Andreas clearly stated that you have
over-interpreted him.
No. I reiterate things where Andreas has given misleading answers to
direct questions (he
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060310 16:25]:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060310 14:42]:
[...]
You reiterate things where Andreas clearly stated that you have
over-interpreted him.
No. I reiterate things where Andreas has
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:44:05PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
The first was Chip Salzenburg's request for a key update, subsequent
flaming over lack of responsiveness, and eventual resignation. AIUI,
Chip happened to make the request when James was particularly busy,
including increasingly
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last November, you and the DPL team wanted to propose a GR that would
have forcibly made everyone in a position of authority a formal
delegate, and stated that you had replacements ready if they were
unwilling to comply.
It's been pointed out to me
301 - 400 of 565 matches
Mail list logo
