On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Many people consider the aggressive, often unconstructive atmosphere on
major Debian mailing lists to be a problem. You only need to make a
little spark and suddenly you have ignited a huge thread, up to several
hundred mails per
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
long, is asking
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:13:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
During DPL campaigning, it seems in for candidates to propose all
sorts of Great Things they will try to do once elected. While this is
obviously all interesting information, it leaves out something that, I
think, is also fairly
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
regular basis, they normally are not released
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 09:07:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060304 01:32]:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would
they be ?
Communication,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:39:08PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:08:15PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
And, do you think this code of conduct should be enforced? How?
We already have a code of conduct for the lists that's not enforced;
it says you can't swear, and
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Secondly, I believe the personality problems thing is about a quote of
mine on -private[1]
Actually it wasn't really a quote at all; if anyone cared I was going
to point at Ted/Jonathan's platform with remarks like Most of us are
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-04 13:06:37]:
Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
long, is asking for too
* Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-02 14:49:37]:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
- purpose-driven
- predictable
- warm and welcoming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:17:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:37:48AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Secondly, I believe the personality problems thing is about a quote of
mine on -private[1]
Actually it wasn't really a quote at all; if anyone cared I was going
* Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-04 14:13:42]:
So, my question: please name any behaviour or act you've observed with
previous DPLs (naming the name of the respective DPL is not required)
that you think was a mistake, and which you will try not to make during
your term?
I will
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-04 13:02:20]:
Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
regular basis, they normally are not released roughly two months after
the last update
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-27 12:18:55]:
Two years ago, Branden Robinson talked about the issue of some tasks in
the project that are neither delegated by the Project leader nor covered
by the Constitution directly. [1] He referenced his platform from 2004
last year
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:13:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
During DPL campaigning, it seems in for candidates to propose all
sorts of Great Things they will try to do once elected. While this is
obviously all interesting information, it leaves out something that, I
think, is also fairly
* MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060304 01:32]:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be
?
Communication, communication, communication.
Would you prefer the notoriety
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi everyone,
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
If such a necessity were forced upon me, I would answer
Liberté Égalité Fraternité.
Cheers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi everyone,
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
If such a necessity were forced upon me, I would answer
Liberté Égalité Fraternité.
Hm. So you
Heya,
Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
regular basis, they normally are not released roughly two months after
the last update (which is the official plan).
Do you know why this doesn't work
Heya,
Though there are often threads about problems with it on our mailing
lists, the NM process hasn't changed much in the last three or four
years. What do you think about the most common problems (takes too
long, is asking for too broad knowledge)?
Do you think that we need to change the NM
Hi,
During DPL campaigning, it seems in for candidates to propose all
sorts of Great Things they will try to do once elected. While this is
obviously all interesting information, it leaves out something that, I
think, is also fairly important: the things you think previous DPLs have
done wrongly,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
Though Martin 'Joey' Schulze as stable release manager presents lists of
packages that are accepted into the next stable point release on a
regular basis, they normally are not released roughly two months after
the last
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
A code of conduct has often been mentioned as a possible solution to
various communication problems we have. The code would have to specify,
either explicitly or implicitly, some rules for acceptable behavior.
What do you think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Maybe, it is not right, asking here as I am not a DD at all, but I
wonder about the web presentation of candidates.
1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform,
but does not give an alternative description for lynx
Jutta Wrage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform,
but does not give an alternative description for lynx users and blind
people - accident?
I didn't see any pictures in firefox, either.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
Hi!
Hi Jutta!
Maybe, it is not right, asking here as I am not a DD at all, but I
wonder about the web presentation of candidates.
1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform,
but does not give an alternative
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
In all other plattforms there are only minor validation problems that
can be corrected easily without making a noticible difference. But as
far as I can see, none of the pages really was valid HTML strict and
none (or nearly
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
In all other plattforms there are only minor validation problems that
can be corrected easily without making a noticible difference. But as
far as I can see, none of the pages really was valid HTML strict and
none (or nearly none) uses
Jutta Wrage wrote:
1. One of the candidates uses pictures to illustrate his platform, but
does not give an alternative description for lynx users and blind
people - accident?
My platform was originally in the form of one big PNG file since I
didn't want lynx users to be able to read it at
Many people consider the aggressive, often unconstructive atmosphere on
major Debian mailing lists to be a problem. You only need to make a
little spark and suddenly you have ignited a huge thread, up to several
hundred mails per day, a number of which are personal attacks. Even if
they aren't,
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think of a code of conduct? What in your opinion would be a
lower limit on acceptable behavior? Do you think that strict rules would
be better than general guidelines? Who should be the judge if a
particular case follows the code of conduct
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Do you think that strict rules would be better than general guidelines?
In my experience, strict rules, and even general guidelines are never
enforced evenly, but are used against unpopular people. A just law is
one that is
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
Communication, communication, communication.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
Maybe, it is not right, asking here as I am not a DD at all, but I
wonder about the web presentation of candidates.
I think it's also for non-DD contributors important who's the DPL. So if
you want to bring up issues you feel are
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
I thought I already did: Vitality, Recruiting, Direction
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi everyone,
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi everyone,
If you had to summarize your platform with 3 keywords, what would they be ?
* Communication
* Standards
* Training
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Should we amend our constitution to reflect how Debian is structured in
reality, or should the people doing these tasks now be recognised as
delegates of the DPL? What will you do to clarify the situation?
We should ensure
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
Two years ago, Branden Robinson talked about the issue of some tasks in
the project that are neither delegated by the Project leader nor covered
by the Constitution directly. [1] He referenced his platform from
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Heya,
Two years ago, Branden Robinson talked about the issue of some tasks
in the project that are neither delegated by the Project leader nor
covered by the Constitution directly. [1] He referenced his platform
from 2004 last year (when he was elected), but it
Heya,
Two years ago, Branden Robinson talked about the issue of some tasks in
the project that are neither delegated by the Project leader nor covered
by the Constitution directly. [1] He referenced his platform from 2004
last year (when he was elected), but it seems that nothing has happened
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt writes (question for all candidates):
So, to the question:
Should we amend our constitution to reflect how Debian is structured in
reality, or should the people doing these tasks now be recognized as
delegates of the DPL? What will you do to clarify the situation?
I'm
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Should we amend our constitution to reflect how Debian is structured in
reality, or should the people doing these tasks now be recognized as
delegates of the DPL? What will you do to clarify the situation?
There are two
aj wrote:
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Do we actually need a DPL? Would we be noticeably worse off without a DPL?
ObVious: We'd be violating the constitution not to have one; if we
refuse to elect one, we'll just have Manoj and Ian act as the DPL until
we work out what we want.
snip more
* Henning Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-15 12:32]:
It has been asserted on several occasions over the last few years that
the security team is overworked and understaffed. This is a problem
that is hard for the average developer to help with, because someone
who spontaneously volunteers
Steve McIntyre wrote:
Do we actually need a DPL? Would we be noticeably worse off without a DPL?
ObVious: We'd be violating the constitution not to have one; if we
refuse to elect one, we'll just have Manoj and Ian act as the DPL until
we work out what we want.
The general answer is, in my view,
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you believe that the tech-ctte should be relatively inactive? Or do
you believe that an inactive Technical Committee is a bad thing?
I don't think it would be a bad thing for the technical committee to be
more active, but I don't think that's
Do we actually need a DPL? Would we be noticeably worse off without a DPL?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten. -- Malcolm Ray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blu Corater) writes:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
Note that the LWN article about the DPL election has some quotes from
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:25:32AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
Since October of 2002, HP has sponsored a subscription to LWN for all
interested Debian developers, so this shouldn't be an issue for anyone
eligible to vote in DPL elections.
And thanks for that; it's been a great benefit to
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:41:35PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they
have only made two rulings:
* 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
* 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 04:50:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:41:35PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
If the latter, do you propose (as they would be your delegates) to make
any changes to the current make-up of the committee.
The Technical Committee are
The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they
have only made two rulings:
* 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
* 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum /dev/null should
produce the bare md5sum value.
The md5sum ruling was a
Scott James Remnant wrote:
The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they
have only made two rulings:
* 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
* 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum /dev/null should
produce the bare md5sum value.
Do
Hello DPL candidate,
My question is:
How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
Thanks in advance for your answers,
--
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do you see the relation between Debian and Ubuntu in the future?
Note that the LWN article about the DPL election has some quotes from
the candidates about Ubuntu and Debian at:
URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/127031/
Your question is probably (at
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:02:09PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Also, it would show me that the project actually thinks that the
tasks I listed in my platform are important, and that the project
stands behind what I'm doing.
I must have missed the memo. Since when does this project
* Rune B. Broberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-26 14:27]:
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3
candidates remaining after this election. How will not getting
elected affect your work within Debian, and the goals you stated in
your platforms?
As I said in my platform, I
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:02:09PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Also, it would show me that the project actually thinks that the
tasks I listed in my platform are important, and that the project
stands behind what I'm doing.
I must have missed the memo. Since when does this project
* Rune B. Broberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-02-26 14:27]:
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3
candidates remaining after this election. How will not getting
elected affect your work within Debian, and the goals you stated in
your platforms?
As I said in my platform, I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rune B. Broberg) writes:
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3 candidates
remaining after this election. How will not getting elected affect your
work within Debian, and the goals you stated in your platforms?
I will continue to work for Debian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rune B. Broberg) writes:
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3 candidates
remaining after this election. How will not getting elected affect your
work within Debian, and the goals you stated in your platforms?
I will continue to work for Debian
(This may or may not be answered in your platforms)
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3 candidates
remaining after this election. How will not getting elected affect your
work within Debian, and the goals you stated in your platforms?
--
Rune B. Broberg
Feel free to
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:27:16PM +0100, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3 candidates
remaining after this election. How will not getting elected affect your
work within Debian, and the goals you stated in your platforms?
I've largely limited
(This may or may not be answered in your platforms)
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3 candidates
remaining after this election. How will not getting elected affect your
work within Debian, and the goals you stated in your platforms?
--
Rune B. Broberg
Feel free to
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:27:16PM +0100, Rune B. Broberg wrote:
Only one person can 'win' this election, meaning we'll have 3 candidates
remaining after this election. How will not getting elected affect your
work within Debian, and the goals you stated in your platforms?
I've largely limited
501 - 565 of 565 matches
Mail list logo
